|
||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Home | 29 CFR | 40 CFR | 49 CFR | Federal Register | MSDS Search | Purchase CFR e-Books |
1.1 This method may be used for the determination of dissolved, suspended, or total elements in drinking water, surface water, and domestic and industrial wastewaters.
1.2 Dissolved elements are determined in filtered and acidified samples. Appropriate steps must be taken in all analyses to ensure that potential interferences are taken into account. This is especially true when dissolved solids exceed 1500 mg/L. (See Section 5.)
1.3 Total elements are determined after appropriate digestion procedures are performed. Since digestion techniques increase the dissolved solids content of the samples, appropriate steps must be taken to correct for potential interference effects. (See Section 5.)
1.4 Table 1 lists elements for which this method applies along with recommended wavelengths and typical estimated instrumental detection limits using conventional pneumatic nebulization. Actual working detection limits are sample dependent and as the sample matrix varies, these concentrations may also vary. In time, other elements may be added as more information becomes available and as required.
1.5 Because of the differences between various makes and models of satisfactory instruments, no detailed instrumental operating instructions can be provided. Instead, the analyst is referred to the instruction provided by the manufacturer of the particular instrument.
2.1 The method describes a technique for the simultaneous or sequential multielement determination of trace elements in solution. The basis of the method is the measurement of atomic emission by an optical spectroscopic technique. Samples are nebulized and the aerosol that is produced is transported to the plasma torch where excitation occurs. Characteristic atomic-line emission spectra are produced by a radio-frequency inductively coupled plasma (ICP). The spectra are dispersed by a grating spectrometer and the intensities of the lines are monitored by photomultiplier tubes. The photocurrents from the photomultiplier tubes are processed and controlled by a computer system. A background correction technique is required to compensate for variable background contribution to the determination of trace elements. Background must be measured adjacent to analyte lines on samples during analysis. The position selected for the background intensity measurement, on either or both sides of the analytical line, will be determined by the complexity of the spectrum adjacent to the analyte line. The position used must be free of spectral interference and reflect the same change in background intensity as occurs at the analyte wavelength measured. Background correction is not required in cases of line broadening where a background correction measurement would actually degrade the analytical result. The possibility of additional interferences named in 5.1 (and tests for their presence as described in 5.2) should also be recognized and appropriate corrections made.
3.1 Dissolved -- Those elements which will pass through a 0.45 μm membrane filter.
3.2 Suspended -- Those elements which are retained by a 0.45 μm membrane filter.
3.3 Total -- The concentration determined on an unfiltered sample following vigorous digestion (Section 9.3), or the sum of the dissolved plus suspended concentrations. (Section 9.1 plus 9.2).
3.4 Total recoverable -- The concentration determined on an unfiltered sample following treatment with hot, dilute mineral acid (Section 9.4).
3.5 Instrumental detection limit -- The concentration equivalent to a signal, due to the analyte, which is equal to three times the standard deviation of a series of ten replicate measurements of a reagent blank signal at the same wavelength.
3.6 Sensitivity -- The slope of the analytical curve, i.e. functional relationship between emission intensity and concentration.
3.7 Instrument check standard -- A multielement standard of known concentrations prepared by the analyst to monitor and verify instrument performance on a daily basis. (See 7.6.1)
3.8 Interference check sample -- A solution containing both interfering and analyte elemelts of known concentration that can be used to verify background and interelement correction factors. (See 7.6.2.)
3.9 Quality control sample -- A solution obtained from an outside source having known, concentration values to be used to verify the calibration standards. (See 7.6.3)
3.10 Calibration standards -- A series of known standard solutions used by the analyst for calibration of the instrument (i.e., preparation of the analytical curve). (See 7.4)
3.11 Linear dynamic range -- The concentration range over which the analytical curve remains linear.
3.12 Reagent blank -- A volume of deionized, distilled water containing the same acid matrix as the calibration standards carried through the entire analytical scheme. (See 7.5.2)
3.13 Calibration blank -- A volume
of deionized, distilled water acidified with HNO 3.14 Methmd of standard addition --
The standard addition technique involves the use of the unknown and the
unknown plus a known amount of standard. (See 10.6.1.)
4.1 The toxicity of carcinogenicity of
each reagent used in this method has not been precisely defined; however, each
chemical compound should be treated as a potential health hazard. From this
viewpoint, exposure to these chemicals must be reduced to the lowest possible
level by whatever means available. The laboratory is repsonsible for maintaining
a current awareness file of OSHA regulations regarding the safe handling of the
chemicals specified in this method. A reference file of material data handling
sheets should also be made available to all personnel involved in the chemical
analysis. Additional references to laboratory safety are available and have been
identified (14.7,14.8and14.9) for the information of the analyst.
5.1 Several types of interference effects
may contribute to inaccuracies in the determination of trace elements. They can
be summarized as follows:
5.1.1 Spectral interferences can be
categorized as (1) overlap of a spectral line from another element; (2)
unresolved overlap of molecular band spectra; (3) background contribution from
continuous or recombination phenomena; and (4) background contribution from
stray light from the line emission of high concentration elements. The first of
these effects can be compensated by utilizing a computer correction of the raw
data, requiring the monitoring and measurement of the interfering element. The
second effect may require selection of an alternate wavelength. The third and
fourth effects can usually be compensated by a background correction adjacent to
the analyte line. In addition, users of simultaneous multi-element
instrumentation must assume the responsibility of verifying the absence of
spectral interference from an element that could occur in a sample but for which
there is no channel in the instrument array. Listed in Table 2 are some
interference effects for the recommended wavelengths given in Table 1. The data
in Table 2 are intended for use only as a rudimentary guide for the indication
of potential spectral interferences. For this purpose, linear relations between
concentration and intensity for the analytes and the interferents can be
assumed. The Interference information, which was collected at the Ames
Laboratory, 1 1Ames Laboratory, USDOE, Iowa State University, Ames Iowa
50011. Only those interferents listed were investigated and the blank spaces in
Table 2 indicate that measurable interferences were not observed for the
interferent concentrations listed in Table 3. Generally, interferences were
discernible if they produced peaks or background shifts corresponding to 2-5% of
the peaks generated by the analyte concentrations also listed in Table 3.
At present, information on the listed silver and potassium wavelengths are
not available but it has been reported that second order energy from the
magnesium 383.231 nm wavelength interferes with the listed potassium line at
766.491 nm.
5.1.2 Physical interferences are
generally considered to be effects associated with the sample nebulization and
transport processes. Such properties as change in viscosity and surface tension
can cause significant inaccuracies especially in samples which may contain high
dissolved solids and/or acid concentrations. The use of a peristaltic pump may
lessen these interferences. If these types of interferences are operative, they
must be reduced by dilution of the sample and/or utilization of standard
addition techniques. Another problem which can occur from high dissolved solids
is salt buildup at the tip of the nebulizer. This affects aersol flow rate
causing instrumental drift. Wetting the argon prior to nebulization, the use of
a tip washer, or sample dilution have been used to control this problem. Also,
it has been reported that better control of the argon flow rate improves
instrument performance. This is accomplished with the use of mass flow
controllers.
5.1.3 Chemical Interferences are
characterized by molecular compound formation, ionization effects and solute
vaporization effects. Normally these effects are not pronounced with the ICP
technique, however, if observed they can be minimized by careful selection of
operating conditions (that is, incident power, observation position, and so
forth), by buffering of the sample, by matrix matching, and by standard addition
procedures. These types of interferences can be highly dependent on matrix type
and the specific analyte element.
5.2 It is recommended that whenever a new
or unusual sample matrix is encountered, a series of tests be performed prior to
reporting concentration data for analyte elements. These tests, as outlined in
5.2.1 through 5.2.4, will ensure the analyst that neither positive nor negative
interference effects are operative on any of the analyte elements thereby
distorting the accuracy of the reported values.
5.2.1 Serial dilution. If the
analyte concentration is sufficiently high (minimally a factor of 10 above the
instrumental detection limit after dilution), an analysis of a dilution should
agree within 5 percent of the original determination (or within some acceptable
control limit (14.3) that has been established for that matrix.). If not, a
chemical or physical interference effect should be suspected.
5.2.2 Spike addition. The recovery
of a spike addition added at a minimum level of 10X the instrumental detection
limit (maximum 100X) to the original determination should be recovered to within
90 to 110 percent or within the established control limit for that matrix. If
not, a matrix effect should be suspected. The use of a standard addition
analysis procedure can usually compensate for this effect.
Caution: The standard addition technique does not detect coincident
spectral overlap. If suspected, use of computerized compensation, an alternate
wavelength, or comparison with an alternate method is recommended (See 5.2.3).
5.2.3 Comparison with alternate method
of analysis. When investigating a new sample matrix, comparison tests may be
performed with other analytical techniques such as atomic absorption
spectrometry, or other approved methodology.
5.2.4 Wavelength scanning of analyte
line region. If the appropriate equipment is available, wavelength scanning
can be performed to detect potential spectral interferences.
6.1 Inductively Coupled Plasma-Atomic
Emission Spectrometer.
6.1.1 Computer controlled atomic emission
spectrometer with background correction.
6.1.2 Radiofrequency generator.
6.1.3 Argon gas supply, welding grade or
better.
6.2 Operating conditions -- Because of the
differences between various makes and models of satisfactory instruments, no
detailed operating instructions can be provided. Instead, the analyst should
follow the instructions provided by the manufacturer of the particular
instrument. Sensitivity, instrumental detection limit, precision, linear dynamic
range, and interference effects must be investigated and established for each
individual analyte line on that particular instrument. It is the responsibility
of the analyst to verify that the instrument configuration and operating
conditions used satisfy the analytical requirements and to maintain quality
control data confirming instrument performance and analytical results.
7.1 Acids used in the preparation of
standards and for sample processing must be ultra-high purity grade or
equivalent. Redistilled acids are acceptable.
7.1.1 Acetic acid, conc. (sp gr
1.06).
7.1.2 Hydrochloric acid, conc. (sp
gr 1.19).
7.1.3 Hydrochloric acid, (1+1): Add
500 mL conc. HCl (sp gr 1.19) to 400 mL deionized, distilled water and dilute to
1 liter.
7.1.4 Nitric acid, conc. (sp gr
1.41).
7.1.5 Nitric acid, (1+1): Add 500
mL conc. HNO 7.2 Deionized, distilled water:
Prepare by passing distilled water through a mixed bed of cation and anion
exchange resins. Use deionized, distilled water for the preparation of all
reagents, calibration standards and as dilution water. The purity of this water
must be equivalent to ASTM Type II reagent water of Specification D 1193 (14.6).
7.3 Standard stock solutions may be
purchased or prepared from ultra high purity grade chemicals or metals. All
salts must be dried for 1 h at 105°C unless otherwise specified.
(CAUTION: Many metal salts are extremely toxic and may be fatal if swallowed.
Wash hands thoroughly after handling.)
Typical stock solution preparation procedures follow:
7.3.1 Aluminum solution, stock, 1
mL=100μg Al: Dissolve 0.100 g of aluminum metal in an acid mixture of 4 mL of
(1+1) HCl and 1 mL of conc. HNO 7.3.2 Antimony solution stock, 1
mL=100 μg Sb: Dissolve 0.2669 g K(SbO)C 7.3.3 Arsenic solution, stock, 1
mL=100 μg As: Dissolve 0.1320 g of As 7.3.4 Barium solution, stock, 1
mL=100 μg Ba: Dissolve 0.1516 g BaCl 7.3.5 Beryllium solution, stock, 1
mL=100 μg Be: Do not dry. Dissolve 1.966 g BeSO 7.3.6 Boron solution, stock, 1
mL=100μg B: Do not dry. Dissolve 0.5716 g anhydrous H 7.3.7 Cadmium solution, stock, 1
mL=100 μg Cd: Dissolve 0.1142 g CdO in a minimum amount of (1+1) HNO 7.3.8 Calcium solution, stock, 1
mL=100 μg Ca: Suspend 0.2498 g CaCO 7.3.9 Chromium solution, stock, 1
mL=100 μg Cr: Dissolve 0.1923 g of CrO 7.3.10 Cobalt solution, stock, 1
mL=100 μg Co: Dissolve 0.1000 g of cobalt metal in a minimum amount of (1+1)
HNO 7.3.11 Copper solution, stock, 1
mL=100 μg Cu: Dissolve 0.1252 g CuO in a minimum amount of (1+1) HNO 7.3.12 Iron solution, stock, 1
mL=100 μg Fe: Dissolve 0.1430 g Fe 7.3.13 Lead solution, stock, 1
mL=100 μg Pb: Dissolve 0.1599 g Pb(NO 7.3.14 Magnesium solution, stock, 1
mL=100 μg Mg: Dissolve 0.1658 g MgO in a minimum amount of (1+1) HNO 7.3.15 Manganese solution, stock, 1
mL=100 μg Mn: Dissolve 0.1000 g of manganese metal in the acid mixture 10 mL
conc. HCl and 1 mL conc. HNO 7.3.16 Molybdenum solution, stock,
1 mL=100 μg Mo: Dissolve 0.2043 g (NH 7.3.17 Nickel solution, stock, 1
mL=100 μg Ni: Dissolve 0.1000 g of nickel metal in 10 mL hot conc. HNO 7.3.18 Potassium solution, stock, 1
mL=100 μg K: Dissolve 0.1907 g KCl, dried at 110 °C, in deionized, distilled
water and dilute to 1,000 mL.
7.3.19 Selenium solution, stock, 1
mL=100 μg Se: Do not dry. Dissolve 0.1727 g H 7.3.20 Silica solution, stock, 1
mL=100 μg SiO 7.3.21 Silver solution, stock, 1
mL=100 μg Ag: Dissolve 0.1575 g AgNO 7.3.22 Sodium solution, stock, 1
mL=100 μg Na: Dissolve 0.2542 g NaCl in deionized, distilled water. Add 10.0 mL
conc. HNO 7.3.23 Thallium solution, stock, 1
mL=100 μg Tl: Dissolve 0.1303 g TlNO 7.3.24 Vanadium solution, stock, 1
mL=100 μg V: Dissolve 0.2297 NH 7.3.25 Zinc solution, stock, 1
mL=100 μg Zn: Dissolve 0.1245 g ZnO in a minimum amount of dilute HNO 7.4 Mixed calibration standard
solutions -- Prepare mixed calibration standard solutions by combining
appropriate volumes of the stock solutions in volumetric flasks. (See 7.4.1 thru
7.4.5) Add 2 mL of (1+1) HNO 7.4.1 Mixed standard solution I --
Manganese, beryllium, cadmium, lead, and zinc.
7.4.2 Mixed standard solution II --
Barium, copper, iron, vanadium, and cobalt.
7.4.3 Mixed standard solution III
-- Molybdenum, silica, arsenic, and selenium.
7.4.4 Mixed standard solution IV --
Calcium, sodium, potassium, aluminum, chromium and nickel.
7.4.5 Mixed standard solution V --
Antimony, boron, magnesium, silver, and thallium.
Note: 1. If the addition of silver to the recommended acid combination
results in an initial precipitation, add 15 mL of deionized distilled water and
warm the flask until the solution clears. Cool and dilute to 100 mL with
deionized, distilled water. For this acid combination the silver concentration
should be limited to 2 mg/L. Silver under these conditions is stable in a tap
water matrix for 30 days. Higher concentrations of silver require additional
HCl.
7.5 Two types of blanks are required for
the analysis. The calibration blank (3.13) is used in establishing the
analytical curve while the reagent blank (3.12) is used to correct for possible
contamination resulting from varying amounts of the acids used in the sample
processing.
7.5.1 The calibration blank is
prepared by diluting 2 mL of (1+1) HNO 7.5.2 The reagent blank must
contain all the reagents and in the same volumes as used in the processing of
the samples. The reagent blank must be carried through the complete procedure
and contain the same acid concentration in the final solution as the sample
solution used for analysis.
7.6 In addition to the calibration
standards, an instrument check standard (3.7), an interference check sample
(3.8) and a quality control sample (3.9) are also required for the analyses.
7.6.1 The instrument check standard
is prepared by the analyst by combining compatible elements at a concentration
equivalent to the midpoint of their respective calibration curves. (See 12.1.1.)
7.6.2 The interference check sample
is prepared by the analyst in the following manner. Select a representative
sample which contains minimal concentrations of the analytes of interest but
known concentration of interfering elements that will provide an adequate test
of the correction factors. Spike the sample with the elements of interest at the
approximate concentration of either 100 μg/L or 5 times the estimated detection
limits given in Table 1. (For effluent samples of expected high concentrations,
spike at an appropriate level.) If the type of samples analyzed are varied, a
synthetically prepared sample may be used if the above criteria and intent are
met.
7.6.3 The quality control sample
should be prepared in the same acid matrix as the calibration standards at a
concentration near 1 mg/L and in accordance with the instructions provided by
the supplier. The Quality Assurance Branch of EMSL-Cincinnati will either supply
a quality control sample or information where one of equal quality can be
procured. (See 12.1.3.)
8.1 For the determination of trace
elements, contamination and loss are of prime concern. Dust in the laboratory
environment, impurities in reagents and impurities on laboratory apparatus which
the sample contacts are all sources of potential contamination. Sample
containers can introduce either positive or negative errors in the measurement
of trace elements by (a) contributing contaminants through leaching or surface
desorption and (b) by depleting concentrations through adsorption. Thus the
collection and treatment of the sample prior to analysis requires particular
attention. Laboratory glassware including the sample bottle (whether
polyethylene, polyproplyene or FEP-fluorocarbon) should be thoroughly washed
with detergent and tap water; rinsed with (1+1) nitric acid, tap water, (1+1)
hydrochloric acid, tap and finally deionized, distilled water in that order (See
Notes 2 and 3).
Note: 2. Chromic acid may be useful to remove organic deposits from
glassware; however, the analyst should be cautioned that the glassware must be
thoroughly rinsed with water to remove the last traces of chromium. This is
especially important if chromium is to be included in the analytical scheme. A
commercial product, NOCHROMIX, available from Godax Laboratories, 6 Varick St.,
New York, NY 10013, may be used in place of chromic acid. Chromic acid should
not be used with plastic bottles.
Note: 3. If it can be documented through an active analytical quality
control program using spiked samples and reagent blanks, that certain steps in
the cleaning procedure are not required for routine samples, those steps may be
eliminated from the procedure.
8.2 Before collection of the sample a
decision must be made as to the type of data desired, that is dissolved,
suspended or total, so that the appropriate preservation and pretreatment steps
may be accomplished. Filtration, acid preservation, etc., are to be performed at
the time the sample is collected or as soon as possible thereafter.
8.2.1 For the determination of dissolved
elements the sample must be filtered through a 0.45-μm membrane filter as soon
as practical after collection. (Glass or plastic filtering apparatus are
recommended to avoid possible contamination.) Use the first 50-100 mL to rinse
the filter flask. Discard this portion and collect the required volume of
filtrate. Acidify the filtrate with (1+1) HNO 8.2.2 For the determination of suspended
elements a measured volume of unpreserved sample must be filtered through a
0.45-μm membrane filter as soon as practical after collection. The filter plus
suspended material should be transferred to a suitable container for storage
and/or shipment. No preservative is required.
8.2.3 For the determination of total or
total recoverable elements, the sample is acidified with (1+1) HNO
9.1 For the determinations of dissolved
elements, the filtered, preserved sample may often be analyzed as received. The
acid matrix and concentration of the samples and calibration standards must be
the same. (See Note 6.) If a precipitate formed upon acidification of the sample
or during transit or storage, it must be redissolved before the analysis by
adding additional acid and/or by heat as described in 9.3.
9.2 For the determination of suspended
elements, transfer the membrane filter containing the insoluble material to a
150-mL Griffin beaker and add 4 mL conc. HNO Note: 4. In place of filtering, the sample after diluting and mixing
may be centrifuged or allowed to settle by gravity overnight to remove insoluble
material.
9.3 For the determination of total
elements, choose a measured volume of the well mixed acid preserved sample
appropriate for the expected level of elements and transfer to a Griffin beaker.
(See Note 5.) Add 3 mL of conc. HNO Note: 5. If low determinations of boron are critical, quartz glassware
should be used.
Note: 6. If the sample analysis solution has a different acid
concentration from that given in 9.4, but does not introduce a physical
interference or affect the analytical result, the same calibration standards may
be used.
9.4 For the determination of total
recoverable elements, choose a measured volume of a well mixed, acid preserved
sample appropriate for the expected level of elements and transfer to a Griffin
beaker. (See Note 5.) Add 2 mL of (1+1) HNO
10.1 Set up instrument with proper
operating parameters established in Section 6.2. The instrument must be allowed
to become thermally stable before beginning. This usually requires at least 30
min. of operation prior to calibration.
10.2 Initiate appropriate operating
configuration of computer.
10.3 Profile and calibrate instrument
according to instrument manufacturer's recommended procedures, using the typical
mixed calibration standard solutions described in Section 7.4. Flush the system
with the calibration blank (7.5.1) between each standard. (See Note 7.) (The use
of the average intensity of multiple exposures for both standardization and
sample analysis has been found to reduce random error.)
Note: 7. For boron concentrations greater than 500 μg/L extended flush
times of 1 to 2 minutes may be required.
10.4 Before beginning the sample run,
reanalyze the highest mixed calibration standard as if it were a sample.
Concentration values obtained should not deviate from the actual values by more
than ±5 percent (or the established control limits whichever is lower). If they
do, follow the recommendations of the instrument manufacturer to correct for
this condition.
10.5 Begin the sample run flushing the
system with the calibration blank solution (7.5.1) between each sample. (See
Note 7.) Analyze the instrument check standard (7.6.1) and the calibration blank
(7.5.1) each 10 samples.
10.6 If it has been found that methods of
standard addition are required, the following procedure is recommended.
10.6.1 The standard addition technique
(14.2) involves preparing new standards in the sample matrix by adding known
amounts of standard to one or more aliquots of the processed sample solution.
This technique compensates for a sample constitutent that enhances or depresses
the analyte signal thus producing a different slope from that of the calibration
standards. It will not correct for additive interference which causes a baseline
shift. The simplest version of this technique is the single-addition method. The
procedure is as follows. Two identical aliquots of the sample solution, each of
volume V