 |
METAL AND METALLOID PARTICULATES IN
WORKPLACE ATMOSPHERES (ICP ANALYSIS) |
 |
| Method No.: |
ID-125G |
| Control No.: |
T-ID125G-FV-02-0011-M |
| Matrix: |
Air, Wipe, or Bulk |
| OSHA Permissible Exposure Limits: |
Permissible Exposure Limits (PELs) are
listed in Table
1 for elements commonly found in industrial environments. This
method has the capability of sampling and analyzing more than these
elements, the number being limited by instrumental capability, as
well as digestion solubility and stability. |
| Collection Procedure: |
A calibrated personal sampling pump is used
to draw a known volume of air through a mixed-cellulose
ester membrane filter contained in a styrene cassette. |
Minimum Recommended Air
Volumes: Time Weighted Average
Samples Short-Term Exposure Limit
Samples Ceiling Samples |
480 L 30 L* 10 L** |
| Recommended Sampling Rate: |
2 L/min |
| Analytical Procedure: |
Filters are digested with sulfuric acid and
hydrogen peroxide. Dissolution of the elements is facilitated by
addition of hydrochloric acid. Analysis is performed using
Inductively Coupled Argon Plasma-Atomic Emission
Spectroscopy (ICAP-AES). |
| Detection Limits: |
See Table
2 |
| Validation Level: |
See Table
3 |
| Precision and Accuracy: |
See Table
3 |
| Method Classification: |
Validated analytical method |
| Chemist: |
Jerry Septon |
| Date (Date Revised): |
November, 1988 (April, 1991) |
| * |
Take 60-L samples when evaluating STEL
exposures to beryllium. |
| ** |
The analytical sensitivity of a specific
analyte may dictate using a larger air
volume. | |
Commercial manufacturers and products mentioned in this method
are for descriptive use only and do not constitute endorsements by
USDOL-OSHA. Similar products from other sources can be
substituted.
Division of Physical Measurements and Inorganic Analyses OSHA
Technical Center Salt Lake City, Utah
1. Introduction
1.1. Scope
1.1.1. This method describes the collection and subsequent
analysis of airborne metal and metalloid particulate by Inductively
Coupled Argon Plasma-Atomic Emission Spectroscopy
(ICAP-AES).
1.1.2. This method provides rapid simultaneous analysis and data
reduction for a wide range of elements, eliminating the necessity of
separate analyses by conventional atomic absorption techniques.
1.1.3. This method was validated for 13 elements (Be, Cd, Co, Cr,
Cu, Fe, Mn, Mo, Ni, Pb, Sb, V, and Zn). A total of 20 to 21 elements
are analyzed, but 8 of these are determined
semi-quantitatively only [Ag, Al, As, Ca, Mg, Se, Si,
and Sn (dependent on instrument, Te replaces Si for one instrument].
Other elements can be added to or subtracted from the method. The
capability for expanding the analysis to other elements is mainly
dependent on laboratory instrumentation and element solubility and
stability in the acid matrix used for digestion.
1.1.4. The method is compatible with determining exposures to
arsenic in industrial environments. The sample is collected,
prepared and screened for arsenic using this method. A portion of
the sample is resubmitted and analyzed using the discussed technique
(Heated Graphite Atomizer with Zeeman/L'vov Platform) in OSHA Method
No. ID-105
(8.1.).
1.2. History
1.2.1. Previous to the introduction of ICAP-AES, samples
containing metallic particulates were digested in a variety of ways
and analyzed by Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy (AAS) at the OSHA
Analytical Laboratory.
1.2.2. A first generation plasma source and spectrometer
(Jarrell-Ash Model 975 Atomcomp) was then used by the OSHA
Analytical Laboratory. The analytical procedure for this instrument
is described in OSHA Method No. ID-125 (8.2.).
1.2.3. Procurement of new inductively coupled plasma (ICP)
instruments, computers, and software allowed samples to be
determined using later technology. This technology includes more
sophisticated computer systems for data reduction and instrument
control.
1.2.4. Currently, three different ICP instruments at the OSHA
Salt Lake Technical Center (OSHA-SLTC) are used to
apply this method:
Jobin-Yvon (JY) Model 32 (Instruments SA, Edison,
NJ) Jarrell-Ash Model 975 Atomcomp* (Thermo Jarrell-Ash Corp.,
Franklin, MA) Applied Research Lab. (ARL) Model 3560 (ARL,
Sunland, CA)
These instruments are further referred to as ICP1, ICP2, or ICP3,
respectively.
The Jarrell-Ash system was upgraded with a new computer,
generator, and software in 1989.
This method is applicable to any simultaneous spectrometer. This
method was validated using ICP1 and the data is presented in a
backup report (8.3.).
An additional evaluation was performed using ICP3 (8.4.).
2. Detection Limits and Working Ranges (8.3.)
| Note: |
This method was evaluated before changes to OSHA
PELs occurred in January, 1989. The evaluation was based on the
Transitional PELs listed in Table
1 and also found in reference 8.5.
The method should be applicable to the Final Rule PELs listed in
Table
1 and found in reference 8.6. |
2.1. OSHA Permissible Exposure Limits (PELs) (8.6.)
for the elements screened and validated are listed in Table
1. Detection limits and working ranges are in Table
2. All reported detection limits were calculated for 50-mL
solution volumes.
2.2. The optimum working range for each element listed in Table
2 extends several orders of magnitude above each detection limit.
3. Method Performance (8.3.)
3.1. The precision and accuracy data for the 13 validated elements
using ICP1 are listed in Table
3. These values are based on six samples at each concentration
level tested. Solutions of the 13 elements were spiked on
mixed-cellulose ester filters. These samples were then digested and
analyzed using procedures mentioned in this method and in reference 8.3.
3.2. Nine of the thirteen elements reported in Table
3 were spiked at 0.5, 1, and 2 times the PEL*, assuming a 120-L
air volume (*Transitional PELs). Spikes for manganese were calculated
assuming a 30-L air volume. Approximately 200-L air volumes were
assumed for Pb, Ni, and Sb.
3.3. The analytical error (AE) at 95% confidence for each element
listed in Table
3 was calculated as:
±AE% = 100 × [|Mean Bias| + 2(CV)]
Analytical errors for all elements tested were within ±25%; the
greatest value was ±18.1% for V. This element was validated near it's
detection limit.
4. Interferences (8.7.)
High temperatures present in the plasma (5,000 to 8,000°C) minimize
most chemical and matrix interferences. Interferences do exist, however,
and can be categorized as follows:
4.1. Physical interferences such as nebulization and transport
effects are influences that determine the rate and particle size in
which analytes are delivered to the plasma. These effects are
minimized by matching the acid concentrations of samples and
standards.
4.2. Chemical interferences are characterized by molecular compound
formation, ionization effects, and solute volatilization effects.
These effects are not severe in ICP analysis and are minimized by
matrix matching and careful selection of operating conditions such as:
incident plasma source power, sample uptake rate and plasma
observation height.
4.3. Spectral interferences include:
- Unresolved overlap of molecular band spectra.
- Overlap of a spectral line from another element.
- Background from continuous or recombination phenomena.
- Background from stray light.
4.4. The first effect (a) can be minimized by a careful selection
of wavelengths for the reported elements (see Table
4 - three different instruments and their wavelengths are listed).
The other types of spectral interferences (spectral overlap and
elevated background) are minimized by software which performs
interelement corrections. This software assumes a linear relationship
between the analyte and interference within the working range limits.
A spectral interference correction equation typically used by ICP
manufacturers is:
Corrected Concn = Calculated Concn -
Ai × CPi
Where:
| Ai |
= |
Correction factor |
| CPi |
= |
Concentration of the interfering
element |
Samples having analyte concentrations above the working range
limits should be diluted into range; interelement corrections may not
be accurate above the working range. Experimentally determined
interelement corrections for the validated elements are listed in
reference 8.3.
4.5. If necessary, supplemental background correction can be
performed with additional software supplied by the instrument
manufacturer.
5. Sampling
5.1. Equipment
5.1.1. Mixed cellulose ester (MCE) filters (0.8-µm pore size),
cellulose backup pads, and cassettes, 37-mm diameter, part no. MAWP
037 AO (Millipore Corp., Bedford, MA). Cassettes, filters (MCE) and
backup pads of 25-mm diameter can also be used.
5.1.2. Gel bands (Omega Specialty Instrument Co., Chelmsford, MA)
for sealing cassettes.
5.1.3. Sampling pumps capable of sampling at 2 L/min.
5.1.4. Assorted flexible tubing.
5.1.5. Stopwatch and bubble tube or meter for pump calibration.
5.1.6. Scintillation vials, 20-mL, part no. 74515 or 58515,
(Kimble, Div. of Owens-Illinois Inc., Toledo, OH) with polypropylene
or Teflon cap liners. If possible, submit bulk or wipe samples in
these vials for ICP analysis.
5.1.7. Smear tabs, part no. 225-24 (SKC Inc., Eighty Four, PA),
or Whatman no. 41 or no. 42 filters (Whatman LabSales Inc. ,
Hillsboro, OR) for wipe sampling.
5.1.8. Gloves, disposable (for wipe sampling).
5.2. Sampling Procedure - Air Samples
Welding fumes can be characterized using this method. Collect
samples on pre-weighed 37-mm polyvinyl chloride (PVC) filters at 2
L/min flow rate. Conduct the welding fume sampling with the filter
cassette located inside the welding helmet (8.8.).
If the free-space inside the hood precludes the use of 37-mm diameter
cassettes and filters, 25-mm sampling assemblies with pre-weighed PVC
filters can be used.
Desiccate and post-weigh each sample and then calculate total
welding fume exposure:
net weight in µg
air volume in liters |
=
mg/m3 |
and determine compliance with the 5 mg/m3
PEL for welding fumes. Submit the samples to the laboratory for
welding fume/ICP analysis to further characterize the samples.
5.2.1. Place a MCE filter and a cellulose backup pad in each
two- or three-piece cassette. Seal each cassette with a gel band.
5.2.2. Calibrate each personal sampling pump with a prepared
cassette in-line to approximately 2 L/min flow rate.
5.2.3. Attach prepared cassettes to calibrated sampling pumps
(the backup pad should face the pump) and place in appropriate
positions on the employee or workplace area. Collect the samples at
about 2 L/min flow rates. Minimum sampling times recommended are:
Recommended Sampling Times
| Time Weighted Average Samples |
240 min |
| Short-Term Exposure Limit Samples |
15 min* |
| Ceiling Samples |
5 min |
The analytical sensitivity of a specific analyte may dictate
using a larger sampling sampling time.
| * |
When determining compliance with the STEL for
beryllium, take 30-min samples. |
| Note: |
If soluble compounds (i.e.
Cr2+,
Cr3+, soluble salts of Al, Fe, Mo,
Ni, ZnCl2, etc.) are suspected to be
present in the sampled air, take separate samples. Request
analysis for the specific compound(s). These samples are
analyzed using OSHA Method No. ID-121
and not by this method. |
5.2.4. If the filter becomes overloaded while sampling, another
filter cassette should be prepared. Consecutive samples using
shorter sampling periods should be taken if overloading occurs.
5.2.5. Place plastic end caps on each cassette after sampling.
5.2.6. Attach an OSHA-21 seal around each cassette in such a way
as to secure the end caps.
5.3. Sampling Procedure - Wipe Samples
5.3.1. Wear clean, impervious, disposable gloves when taking
each wipe sample to prevent sample contamination.
5.3.2. Moisten the wipe filters with deionized water prior to
use.
5.3.3. If possible, wipe a surface area covering 100
cm2.
5.3.4. Fold the wipe sample with the exposed side in.
5.3.5. Transfer the wipe sample into a 20-mL scintillation vial
and seal with vinyl or electrical tape. Securely wrap an OSHA-21
seal length-wise from vial top to bottom.
5.4. Sampling Procedure - Bulk Samples
In order of laboratory preference, bulk samples may be one of the
following:
- a high-volume filter sample,
- a representative settled dust (i.e. rafter) sample,
- a sample of the bulk material in the workplace.
Transfer the bulk material into a 20-mL scintillation vial and seal
with vinyl or electrical tape. Securely wrap an OSHA-21 seal
length-wise from vial top to bottom.
5.5. Shipment
When other compounds or elements are known or suspected to be
present in the sampled air, such information should be transmitted
with the sample(s) to the laboratory.
5.5.1. Submit at least one blank sample with each set of air or
wipe samples. Blank filter samples should be handled in the same
manner as other samples, except no air is drawn through the blank.
5.5.2. Send the samples to the laboratory with the OSHA 91A
paperwork requesting ICP analysis. If arsenic is also suspected
request ICP analysis/arsenic.
5.5.3. Bulk samples should be shipped separately from air
samples. They should be accompanied by Material Safety Data Sheets
if available. Check current shipping restrictions and ship to the
laboratory by the appropriate method.
6. Analysis
6.1. Safety Precautions
6.1.1. Prepare 1:1
H2SO4 in DI
H2O cautiously.
- Use a 1- or 2-L thick-walled, break- and heat-resistant
bottle.
- Wear thick rubber gloves, plastic apron, labcoat, and face
shield.
- Add 500 mL DI H2O to the bottle.
- Place the bottle over the drain in a sink which has a slot
vent to provide ventilation. Begin running cold tap water over the
side of the bottle, being careful not to get any tap water in the
bottle. Let the level of water rise in the sink to provide cooling
of the bottle.
- Carefully and slowly begin adding 500 mL concentrated
H2SO4 to the
DI H2O. Add a small quantity, swirl to
mix, and allow contents to cool. Do NOT allow boiling of
solution within the container.
- After the acid has been added, loosely cap the bottle and
allow it to remain in the sink with the water running for at least
15 min. Allow the solution to cool to room temperature.
- A thick-walled beaker, Teflon-coated stirring bar, electronic
stirrer and a ventilation hood can also be used to prepare 1:1
H2SO4 if
precautions are taken to prevent solution overheating and
splattering.
6.1.2. Digest all samples within a suitable exhaust hood.
6.1.3. To prevent splattering, add
H2O2 (30%) to
beakers in 2- to 3-drop groups.
6.1.4. Perchloric acid added to organic
substances can produce fires and/or explosions. If
HClO4 solutions darken in color while
heating, immediately remove beakers from the hotplate and carefully
add a small amount of HNO3. Only use
HClO4 in exhaust hoods designed and
reserved for HClO4 use.
6.1.5. Do not directly view the plasma.
6.1.6. Do not override the rf generator or torch box safety
interlocks.
6.2. Equipment
6.2.1. Inductively coupled argon plasma/atomic emission
direct-reading spectrometer, cooling unit for torch assembly,
computer, and radio-frequency (rf) generator.
6.2.2. Nebulizer.
6.2.3. Automatic sampler.
6.2.4. Peristaltic pumps (optional). Use one pump for automatic
sampler rinse. Use the other pump for sample introduction into the
nebulizer.
6.2.5. Mass Flow Controller (optional). Use the controller to
regulate nebulizer argon flow and sample uptake rate.
6.2.6. Borosilicate glass Phillips beakers, 125- and 250-mL.
6.2.7. Borosilicate glass volumetric flasks, 25-, 50-, 100-,
250-mL, and 1- or 2-L. Use the larger flasks for standard
preparation.
6.2.8. Thick walled, 1- or 2-L heat- and break-resistant bottle.
6.2.9. Mixed cellulose ester filters (0.45-µm pore size) and a
filtering apparatus. Use this system to remove any insoluble
particulates from sample solutions.
6.2.10. Hot plate capable of reaching 300°C.
6.2.11. Volumetric pipets, glass of various sizes.
6.2.12. Analytical balance (0.01 mg).
6.3. Reagents (reagent grade or better)
6.3.1. Deionized water (DI H2O).
6.3.2. Concentrated sulfuric
(H2SO4),
hydrochloric (HCl), nitric (HNO3), and
perchloric (HClO4) acids.
6.3.3. Prepare 1:1
H2SO4 (V/V)
solutions as described in Section 6.1.1.
6.3.4. Sample dilution solution or reagent blank (8% HCl/4%
H2SO4):
In an exhaust hood, slowly and carefully add 40 mL concentrated
H2SO4 to
approximately 500 mL of DI H2O contained
in a thick-walled, heat- and break-resistant bottle. Gently stir and
allow the solution to cool to room temperature. Slowly and carefully
add 80 mL conc. HCl, allow to cool, and dilute to 1 L with DI
H2O.
6.3.5. Stock solutions of 1,000 µg/mL for standard preparation of
the various elements.
6.3.6. Hydrogen peroxide,
(H2O2), 30%.
| Note: |
Some manufacturers use organotin compounds to
stabilize
H2O2.
Since Sn is one of the elements screened, use
H2O2 that
does not contain this type of stabilizer. |
6.3.7. Argon - quality as specified by the ICP manufacturer.
6.4. Standard Preparation
Prepare multielement working and control standard solutions (see Table
4 and Table
5 for examples of combinations) using 1,000 or 10,000 µg/mL stock
solutions. A control standard is a mixture of elements whose
concentrations are within their respective analytical linear ranges
and is used to monitor instrumental performance. Whenever possible,
prepare the control standard from different stock solutions than those
used for calibration standards. The control standard should contain
elements and concentrations reflecting what is expected in the
majority of the samples, or problem elements.
The final acid concentration of the working and control standards
is 8% HCl/4%
H2SO4. These
standards should be stable for at least 6 months.
6.5. Sample Preparation
The final acid concentration for the different sample matrices
should be 8% HCl/4%
H2SO4. All of the
elements validated are soluble when using the following acid digestion
procedures. Other elements not included in the validated element list
(Table
3) should be evaluated for solubility and stability before using
these procedures.
| Note: |
Requests for analysis of compounds which have a
PEL that specifically addresses the soluble fraction (i.e. Fe,
Ni, Mo, etc.) are analyzed using OSHA Method No. ID-121
and not by this method. |
Filters, backup pads, wipes, and bulks are prepared by the
following procedures:
6.5.1. Mixed-cellulose ester (MCE) membrane
filters
- Clean the insides of the 125-mL Phillips beakers by refluxing
1:1 HNO3 using a hot plate in a
ventilated hood. Carefully pour the used 1:1
HNO3 into an appropriate labeled
container. Allow beakers to cool, then rinse several times with DI
H2O and allow to dry. Using forceps,
place sample filters in separate labeled and washed beakers (If
the backup pad appears contaminated, see Section 6.5.2.
below).
- For samples with air volumes > 400 L:
Add 4 mL of 1:1
H2SO4 to each
beaker containing the filter sample. For samples with air
volumes < 400 L: Add 2 mL of 1:1
H2SO4.
- To facilitate the digestion, allow the filters to sit at least
an hour in the 1:1
H2SO4. Add
several drops of
H2O2 (30%) to
each beaker before placing it on the hotplate.
- Heat the beakers on a hot plate for approximately 10 min. The
solutions should turn brown.
- Cautiously add
H2O2 in 2- to
3-drop groups until each solution becomes clear, colorless, or
slightly yellow (the color is dependent on the concentration and
type of analyte present).
- Heat several more minutes until dense, white fumes of
SO3 just become evident. Remove the
beakers from the hotplate and allow to cool.
- Slowly and carefully add the following amount of concentrated
HCl (CAUTION: SPLATTERING MAY OCCUR IF THE HCl IS ADDED TOO
RAPIDLY OR THE
H2SO4 SOLUTION
IS STILL HOT):
Acid Addition Data
Acid Volume
|
|
Air Volume
|
| 2 mL |
|
< 400
L |
| 4 mL |
|
> 400
L |
- Rinse the sides of the beakers with DI
H2O and return the beakers to the
hotplate. Heat the beakers until near boiling to promote
solubilization of all elements present. Remove the beakers from
the hotplate and allow to cool.
- Quantitatively transfer the solutions into volumetric flasks
using DI H2O. For samples having air
volumes > 400 L, dilute to 50 mL; volumes < 400 L,
dilute to 25 mL.
6.5.2. Backup Pads
- If the backup pad has been contaminated during collection,
digest the pad along with the filter. Also, separately digest and
analyze the blank filter with a clean backup pad.
- Place each contaminated backup pad and corresponding filter
into individual beakers. Allow to sit at least an hour in the
appropriate amount of 1:1
H2SO4 (Section
6.5.1.,
Step 2). Add 10 mL of concentrated HNO3
and proceed as in Section 6.5.1.,
Step 3 above.
6.5.3. Wipe or Polyvinyl Chloride (PVC) Filter
Samples
Polyvinyl chloride filters are not routinely used for sample
collection and analysis by ICP. The industrial hygienist may sample
for gravimetric determinations of total dust or total welding fumes
using PVC filters and also submit these samples for ICP analysis. If
perchloric acid is used to digest the PVC filters, confirmation of
arsenic content can not be performed using OSHA method no. ID-105
(8.1.).
Extract the particulate on the PVC filter using only
H2SO4, HCl, and
H2O2 if arsenic
is of interest.
- Reflux 1:1 HNO3 in 250-mL (for
wipes) or 125-mL (for PVC filters) Phillips beakers, empty and
allow to cool. Rinse the beakers several times with DI
H2O and allow to dry.
- Place each filter or wipe in a separate washed beaker.
- Add the appropriate amount of 1:1
H2SO4 as
listed below:
Acid Addition Data
Acid Volume*
|
|
Sample Type
|
| 8 mL |
|
Wipe |
| 4 mL |
|
PVC filter (> 400 L Air
Volume) |
| 2 mL |
|
PVC filter (< 400 L Air
Volume) |
| * Concentrated HCl or 1:1
H2SO4
|
- Add 10 mL concentrated HNO3 to each
beaker. Place the beakers on the hotplate.
- Add H2O2
in 2- to 3-drop groups. PVC filters and wipes require more
H2O2 for
digestion than MCE filters.
- If HClO4 digestion precautions are
followed (Section 6.1.4.),
1 to 2 mL of HClO4 can also be used to
complete digestion. Do not add HClO4 if
arsenic analysis is requested or suspected to be present. The
samples can not be further evaluated for arsenic content using
OSHA method no. ID-105
if HClO4 is used. The PVC filter will
not completely digest if HClO4 is not
added; therefore, thoroughly rinse the filter residue with DI
H2O during quantitative transfer of the
sample solution.
- Allow digested samples to cool and carefully add the same
volume of concentrated HCl as the 1:1
H2SO4 used in
Section 6.5.3.,
Step 3. above.
- Rinse the sides of the beaker with DI
H2O and then heat to near boiling.
- After beakers have cooled to room temperature, dilute digested
wipe solutions to 100 mL. Dilute PVC filter solutions to final
volumes as stated in Section 6.5.1.,
Step 9.
6.5.4. Bulks
- Review any available material safety data sheets to determine
safe bulk handling. The safety data may also offer a clue as to
the aliquot amount needed for adequate detection of the element(s)
of interest.
- Measure by volume or weight an appropriate aliquot of any
liquid bulk sample. Weigh the appropriate amount of any solid bulk
sample. Weigh an aliquot of any paint bulk by placing a small
amount on a MCE filter, allow to air dry then take the dry weight.
| Note: |
Aliquot amounts of bulks are dependent on the
analytical sensitivity, detection limit, and solubility of
the material used. If uncertain, a 20- to 50-mg aliquot of a
solid material can be taken as a starting point. Make sure
the aliquot taken is representative of the entire bulk
sample. If needed, use a mortar and pestle to grind any
nonhomogeneous particulate bulk samples in an exhaust
hood. |
After measuring, transfer the aliquot to an acid-washed 250-mL
Phillips beaker.
- Add 20 mL of 1:1
H2SO4 and
digest on a hotplate. Hydrogen peroxide (dropwise) and a few mLs
of HNO3 can be carefully added to break
up the matrix.
| Caution: |
Do not add the HNO3
to wet bulk materials containing organic solvents.
Significant reactions could occur. |
- Remove the beaker from the hotplate and allow to cool.
Carefully add 20 mL of concentrated HCl and then heat the solution
to near boiling.
- Allow to cool and quantitatively transfer to a 250-mL
volumetric flask. Dilute to volume with DI
H2O.
6.5.5. Air, wipe, and bulk samples: If particulates are
present in any of the sample solutions, filter this solution through
a MCE filter (0.45-µm pore size) and then re-digest the particulate
and filter. Save the filtrates for analysis.
6.6. Instrument Startup and Calibration
Follow the manufacturer's instructions for instrument start-up and
calibration. An example of ICP operating parameters is shown below.
These settings will vary from instrument to instrument:
| Gas Used |
Argon |
|
Gas Flow (Rotameter settings) |
Plasma Nebulizer Auxiliary Plasma |
12 - 16 L/min * 0.14 - 0.18 L/min |
| RF Power |
Incident Reflected |
1.1 kW < 5 W |
| Observation Height |
Plasma |
15 mm above work coil |
| Integration Time |
Peak Signal |
3 to 10 s |
| Wash Time |
Automatic Sampler Without Automatic Sampler |
60 s 10 s |
| Number Of Exposures |
Standards & Samples |
2 to 10 |
| Nebulizer* |
Solution Uptake Rate Pressure |
0.8 - 1.6 mL/min ~30 psig |
| Mass Flow Controller |
Flow Rate Range |
varies* |
| * This flow will vary depending on the
type of nebulizer in use. |
6.6.1. Profile the instrument before beginning the calibration
and analysis. Follow the Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) (8.9.)
or manufacturer's instructions for computer initialization and
profiling.
6.6.2. Obtain a two-point calibration curve by nebulizing the
working standards into the plasma and measuring atomic emission
intensities. For most instruments, a first-order linear fit of the
data is computer calculated and slope and intercept coefficients are
obtained. Perform calibrations by following the instrument
manufacturer's guidelines.
6.6.3 See Addendum A for the proper sequence of standards and
samples during the analysis.
6.7. Analytical Procedure
For more details regarding analytical procedures, refer to the
instrument manufacturer's software manual(s) or the SOP (8.9.).
6.7.1. If necessary, determine detection
limits using the manufacturer's software (if available). These
limits normally do not significantly change during short time spans.
A general rule is to recalculate detection limits when an integral
component (nebulizer, torch, mass flow controller, etc.) of the ICP
has been replaced or adjusted. A typical calculation of detection
limit (DL) is shown:
| DL = |
(K × SDI × C)
(I - Io) |
×
S |
Where:
| S |
= |
Solution volume in mL |
| K |
= |
Degree of confidence (sigma value)* |
| SDI |
= |
Standard deviation of reagent blank intensity
(Io.) |
| C |
= |
Concentration of the calibration standard in
µg/mL |
| I |
= |
Total intensity of standard containing
concentration C |
| Io |
= |
Background intensity (reagent
blank) |
* In most cases, K=2 or 3 for qualitative and K=10 for
quantitative determinations.
6.7.2. Analysis using an automatic sampler is described below:
- Fill automatic sample vials to the minimum sample volume for
one analysis and a potential rerun.
- Load the automatic sampler with labeled standard and sample
vials. A multielement working standard should be analyzed after
every 5 to 6 samples. A control standard should be occasionally
analyzed to ensure proper instrument operation. If an element or
elements contained in the control standard are not within
specification (a general rule is to use a value less than ±10 to
15% of the known concentration), the analyst should recalibrate
before proceeding with the analysis.
- Aspirate each sample or standard for approximately 1 min prior
to initiating the exposure cycle. This ensures equilibration in
the plasma and minimizes carry-over effects.
- Dilute and reanalyze any samples containing elements (both
screened and validated) exceeding the working range (Table
2). In particular, notice the reduced upper limit (8
µg/mL) for lead. Interelement corrections may not be
accurate above the working range. Prepare the dilutions by
pipetting an appropriate aliquot from the original solution and
dilute with 8% HCl/4%
H2SO4.
- Based on the calibration curve initially obtained, convert the
sample intensities to concentrations. Then, using the air volume,
solution volume, dilution factor and sample weight, calculate the
concentration for each element analyzed as
mg/m3 (air samples), total micrograms
(wipes), or percentage of total weight (bulks) using the equations
shown below.
6.8. Calculations
6.8.1. Total amount of analyte in the sample:
| µg A = (µg/mL A) × (mL S) × (DF) |
(1) |
Where:
| µg A |
= |
Total µg of analyte in the sample |
| µg/mL A |
= |
Measured concentration of analyte in sample
solution (derived from calibration curve) |
| mL S |
= |
total volume of the solution analyzed |
| DF |
= |
amount of dilution applied to an aliquot of the
original solution (ratio of final volume divided by the
aliquot volume) |
6.8.2. The blank value, if any, is subtracted from each sample:
Where:
| µgc A |
= |
µg of analyte, blank corrected |
| µgb A |
= |
µg of analyte in blank |
6.8.3. For air samples, the concentration of analyte in the
sample is expressed in mg analyte per cubic meter for each element
or compound analyzed:
| mg A/m3 = |
(µgc A) × (GF)
air volume, L | |
(3) |
Where: GF = Gravimetric Factor
For those elements having a PEL listed as an oxide, the
gravimetric factors for the validated elements are:
1.4298 for
Fe2O3
1.2447 for
ZnO 1.7852 for
V2O5
6.8.4. Convert bulk sample analytes to % composition using:
| analyte % (w/w) = |
(µgc A) (100%)
(sample weight) (1,000 µg/mg) | |
(4) |
Where:
| µgc A |
= |
analyte amount (µg) |
| Sample wt |
= |
aliquot (in mg) of bulk taken in Section 6.5.4. |
7. Reporting Results
7.1. Air sample results are reported as
mg/m3. Results for analytes having a PEL as
an oxide are reported as mg/m3 of the oxide.
7.2. Wipe sample concentrations are calculated and reported as
total micrograms for each element.
7.3. Bulk sample results are calculated and reported as elemental
percent by weight (or volume if liquid aliquots were used). Due to
differences in sample matrices between bulks and standards, bulk
results are approximate for each element determined.
7.4. Determinations of the screened elements or compounds are not
routinely reported. Spectral interference corrections for these
analytes are not included and validations have not been performed. If
a sample has a screened analyte over the PEL, the analyst should
contact her/his supervisor. Additional sampling, or if possible,
additional analysis of the original sample should be performed to
quantitate the potential overexposure.
8. References
8.1. Occupational Safety and Health
Administration Technical Center: Arsenic in Workplace
Atmospheres (USDOL/OSHA-SLTC Method No. ID-105).
Salt Lake City, UT. Revised 1991.
8.2. Occupational Safety and Health
Administration Analytical Laboratory: OSHA Analytical Methods
Manual (USDOL/OSHA-SLCAL Method No. ID-125). Cincinnati, OH:
American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (Pub. No.
ISBN: 0-936712-66-X), 1985.
8.3. Occupational Safety and Health
Administration Technical Center: ICP Backup Data Report
(ID-125G) by J.C. Septon. Salt Lake City, UT. Revised 1991.
8.4. Occupational Safety and Health
Administration Technical Center: ICP Backup Data Report (ARL
3560) by J.C. Septon. Salt Lake City, UT. In progress.
8.5. "Toxic and Hazardous Substances," Code of
Federal Regulations Title 29, Pt. 1910.1000, Subpart Z. 1987. pp
676-682.
8.6. "Air Contaminants; Final Rule": Federal
Register 54:12 (19 Jan. 1989). pp. 2923-2960 and also 54:127 (5
July 1989). pp. 28054-28061.
8.7. National Institute for Occupational
Safety and Health: NIOSH Manual of Analytical Methods, 2nd
ed., Vol. 7 (DHEW/NIOSH Pub. No. 82-100). Cincinnati, OH, 1981. Method
No. 351.
8.8. United States Department of Labor,
OSHA: "Memorandum, Sampling for Welding Fumes" by Patricia Clark,
Director Designate, Directorate of Compliance Programs. United States
Department of Labor, OSHA, Washington, DC, February 14, 1989. [Memo].
8.9. Occupational Safety and Health
Administration Analytical Laboratory: ICP Standard Operating
Procedure by J.C. Septon. Salt Lake City, UT. 1988 (unpublished).
Table 1
Air Contaminants - OSHA Permissible Exposure
Limits*
|
| Element |
Substance Exposed to |
Transitional
PEL (mg/m3)
|
Final Rule
PEL (mg/m3)
|
|
|
TWA |
CEILING |
TWA |
STEL |
CEILING |
|
| Ag** |
Metal and soluble compounds (as Ag) |
0.01 |
|
0.01 |
|
| Al** |
Pyro powders Welding fumes |
--- --- |
|
5 5 |
|
| As** |
Inorganic compounds (as As) |
See 29 CFR 1910.1018(a) for
applications |
| Be# |
Beryllium and compounds (as Be) |
0.002 |
0.005## |
0.002 |
0.005## |
0.025 |
| Ca** |
Calcium oxide Calcium cyanamide |
5 --- |
|
5 0.5 |
|
| Cd |
Fume Dust |
0.1 0.2 |
0.3 0.6 |
0.1 0.2 |
|
0.3 0.6 |
| Co |
Metal dust and fume (as Co) Cobalt carbonyl
or hydrocarbonyl (as Co) |
0.1
--- |
|
0.05
0.1 |
|
| Cr |
Cr metal (as Cr) |
1 |
|
1 |
|
| Cu |
Fumes (as Cu) Dusts and mists (as Cu) |
0.1 1 |
|
0.1 1 |
|
| Fe |
Dicyclopentadienyl iron Total
dust Iron oxide fume (as
Fe2O3) |
15 10 |
|
10 10 |
|
| Fe,V |
Ferrovanadium dust |
1 |
|
1 |
3 |
|
| Mg** |
Magnesium oxide fume Total
particulate |
15 |
|
10 |
|
| Mn |
Mn compounds (as Mn) Mn fume (as Mn) Manganese
tetroxide (as Mn) |
--- |
5 5 |
1 1 |
3
|
5
|
| Mo |
Insoluble compounds (as
Mo) Total dust |
15 |
|
10 |
|
| Ni |
Metal and insoluble compounds (as Ni) |
1 |
|
1 |
|
| Pb |
Inorganic (see 29 CFR 1910.1025) |
| Sb |
Sb and compounds (as Sb) |
0.5 |
|
0.5 |
|
| Se** |
Se and compounds (as Se) |
0.2 |
|
0.2 |
|
| Sn** |
Inorganic compounds except
oxides (as Sn) Tin oxide (as Sn) |
2 |
|
2 2 |
| Te** |
Te and compounds (as Te) |
0.1 |
|
0.1 |
|
| Varies |
Welding fumes |
--- |
|
5+ |
|
| Zn |
Zinc oxide fume Zinc
oxide Total dust |
5
15 |
|
5
10 |
10 |
|
|
Zinc stearate Total
dust |
15 |
|
10 |
|
|
| * |
From references 8.5.-8.6. |
| ** |
Elements screened - PELs are listed for
information only, because the screened elements are not
digested or analyzed using optimum conditions. Arsenic is
confirmed using OSHA Method No. ID-105
(8.1.). |
| # |
Beryllium also has a Transitional Peak PEL of
0.025 µg/m3. |
| ## |
Both the Transitional Ceiling Limit and the
STEL for beryllium are for a maximum 30-min duration. |
| + |
Determined gravimetrically. Samples can also be
determined and characterized by ICP. | |
|
| Note: |
Compounds having total and respirable dust PELs
of 15 and 5 mg/m3, respectively, are
normally analyzed gravimetrically. Elements contained in these
dust samples can be identified by this or other methods, if
necessary. | |
Table 2
Detection Limits* and Upper Limits
Analyte
|
Qual. Det. Limit (µg)
|
Quan. Det. Limit (µg)
|
Upper Limit (µg/mL)
|
| Ag** |
1.1 |
3.8 |
** |
| Al** |
6.8 |
23. |
200 |
| As** |
1.7 |
5.7 |
20 |
| Be |
0.013 |
0.043 |
5 |
| Ca** |
0.79 |
2.6 |
20 |
| Cd |
0.14 |
0.47 |
50 |
| Co |
1.2 |
4.0 |
100 |
| Cr |
0.40 |
1.3 |
50 |
| Cu |
0.64 |
2.1 |
50 |
| Fe |
8.9 |
30. |
200 |
| Mg** |
2.1 |
7.1 |
20 |
| Mn |
0.061 |
0.20 |
15 |
| Mo |
0.52 |
1.7 |
100 |
| Pb |
2.1 |
7.0 |
8 |
| Ni |
0.59 |
2.0 |
100 |
| Sb |
4.2 |
14. |
100 |
| Se** |
3.2 |
11. |
20 |
| Si** |
2.4 |
8.1 |
20 |
| Sn** |
3.5 |
12. |
** |
| V |
0.57 |
1.9 |
100 |
| Zn |
0.14 |
0.47 |
50 |
| * |
Calculations are based on a 50-mL solution volume and
equations listed in Section 6.7.1.
Each detection limit is dependent on the spectral wavelength and
order used for analysis. Wavelengths are listed in Table
4. |
| ** |
Screened elements - Limits are approximate - the
digestion and analysis are not optimized for these
elements. |
Both the detection limits and upper limits were determined using ICP1
(JY-32 ICP). Performance may vary from instrument to instrument. Upper
limits are the upper linear range for each element. These were determined
using a linear model (8.3.).
Table 3
Precision and Accuracy Data* for Spiked
Samples
|
Element
|
CV
|
Bias
|
Range (µg)
|
Analytical Error (± %)
|
| Be |
0.010 |
0.010 |
0.12-0.48 |
2.9 |
| Cd1 |
0.014 |
-0.005 |
6-24 |
3.2 |
| Co |
0.020 |
-0.040 |
6-24 |
8.1 |
| Cr2 |
0.015 |
-0.074 |
60-240 |
10.3 |
| Cu3 |
0.017 |
0.054 |
60-240 |
8.7 |
| Fe |
0.018 |
-0.012 |
420-1680 |
4.8 |
| Mn |
0.032 |
0.077 |
75-300 |
14.1 |
| Mo4 |
0.047 |
-0.029 |
225-900 |
12.3 |
| Ni |
0.025 |
0.017 |
105-420 |
6.6 |
| Pb |
0.040 |
0.04 |
5-20 |
12.1 |
| Sb |
0.014 |
0.012 |
60-240 |
3.9 |
| V |
0.045 |
0.090 |
3.5-14 |
18.1 |
| Zn |
0.007 |
0.014 |
240-960 |
2.9 |
| * |
Reported values were obtained from ICP1 (ISA JY-32
ICP). Results may vary from instrument to
instrument. |
The following exceptions were used when calculating spike
amounts:
| 1 |
PEL for fume (0.1 mg/m3)
used |
| 2 |
PEL for insoluble forms (1
mg/m3) used |
| 3 |
PEL for dust form (1 mg/m3)
was used |
| 4 |
5 mg/m3 target
concentration was used. This was performed because a very large
amount of spike would be necessary if the 15
mg/m3 Transitional PEL for Mo was
used. |
|
| CV |
Coefficient of Variation |
Table 4
Calibration Standards and Wavelengths
|
WAVELENGTH (nm)
|
NO
|
ELE
|
STD SOLN
|
CONCN
|
ICP1
|
ICP2
|
ICP3
|
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 |
As Sn Se Mo Si Zn Sb Pb Cd Ni Co Mn Cr Fe Mg V Be Cu Ag Zn+ Ca Al Te |
3 3 3 2 2 3 3 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 1 3 3 |
10.0 10.0 10.0 1.0 1.0 10.0 10.0 5.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 1.0 100.0 10.0 5.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 |
189.0 189.9 196.0 202.0 212.4 213.8 217.5 220.3 226.5 231.6 237.9 257.6 267.7 271.4 279.5 310.2 313.0 324.7 328.0 334.5 393.3 396.1 ----- |
193.6 283.9 196.0 203.8 ----- 213.8 206.8 220.3 226.5 231.6 238.8 293.3 267.7 259.9 279.5 309.3 313.0 324.7 328.0 ----- 317.9 ----- 477.1 |
189.0 189.0 196.0 202.0 288.1 213.8 217.5 220.3 226.5 231.6 228.6 257.6 267.7 259.9 279.0 310.2 313.0 324.7 328.0 ----- 393.3 308.2 214.2 |
Where:
| ELE |
Element |
| STD SOLN |
Calibration standard |
| CONCN |
Concentration (µg/mL) of calibration
standard |
| + |
Additional line for Zn on ICP1 |
The ICP instruments are calibrated using a two-point calibration curve
with the highest standard for each element listed above. A reagent blank
is used as the low standard. Each element calibrated is contained in one
of three separate calibration standards (STD SOLN). For example, mixed
standard no. 2 is used for Co. This mixed standard also contains Si and
Mo.
The three mixed calibration standards were selected because of chemical
compatibility and potential interferences. Other combinations of elements
or concentrations can be used; however, compatibility and possible
interferences have to be considered when combining elements other than the
mixtures listed above.
Table 5
Control Standard
NO.
|
ELE
|
UPPER CONCN
|
LOWER CONCN
|
STD CONCN
|
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 |
Pb Cd Ni Mn Cr V Be Cu Fe |
5.75 11.5 11.5 11.5 2.3 5.75 2.3 2.3 115.0 |
4.25 8.5 8.5 8.5 1.7 4.25 1.7 1.7 85.0 |
5.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 2.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 100.0 |
| ELE |
= |
Element |
| UPPER CONCN |
= |
The upper concentration limit in µg/mL |
| LOWER CONCN |
= |
The lower concentration limit in µg/mL |
| STD CONCN |
= |
The calibration concentration in
µg/mL |
Control standard mixtures are prepared and analyzed as an analytical
monitor ICP performance. Some instrument manufacturers have instituted
analytical software routines which will evaluate control standard results
during the analysis. The control standard listed above is an example which
was used for the ISA JY-32 ICP. Alternate control mixtures can be
prepared.
To illustrate the control standard concept, 5 µg/mL V is used. For this
control standard, V has a limit of ±15% (upper and lower concentration
limits of 5.75 µg/mL and 4.25 µg/mL, respectively). If a calculated value
greater than ±15% is obtained while analyzing the control standard, the
analysis will automatically halt. The ICP operator should then
re-calibrate the instrument.
Addendum A
Sequence for Running Standards and Samples on the ICP and
Criteria for Acceptance
1. Reageant Blank. It is extremely important to get good (low)
intensity numbers here. A sheet will be provided to compare your
numbers.
2. Calibration Std. 1
3. Calibration Std. 2
4. Calibration Std. 3
5. Low Check If some RB intensity numbers are too high, it can
result in lowered concentrations of those elements here. Results should be
within ±15% of stated
values.*
6. Mix/3qc(ICV) A bad calibration std. can affect the
concentration here. Results should be within ±10% of stated
values.*
7. RB
8. ICS Results should be within ±10% of stated value.*
9. RB(CCB)
10. 5-6 Samples
11. Alternate a) Low Check and b) Mix/3qc(CCV) + RB(CCB)
12. Repeat sequence 5-9 at the end
* If the results do not fall within limits for any element, samples
that come after the fault will have be repeated until the fault is fixed.
If an ICS element fails, do not proceed until fixed.
The RB(CCB) must have no element exceeding its quantitative detection
limit.
If an element in a sample exceeds that concentration found in the
regular calibration standards, a higher (bracketing) standard of that
element will need to be run.
Weekly Tests – Run once/week by the first one using the instrument:
(1) BECTEST – Run a solution containing Mn & Pb to track
sensitivity (2) PRECTEST –Run a solution containing As, Cd, Cu and Pb
to track precision
|