1.1 Background
1.1.1 History of procedure
The OSHA Laboratory recently received samples collected on silica
gel tubes requesting analysis for acetamide. There is a NIOSH method
S254 for the collection and analysis of dimethyl acetamide. This
method recommends collection on silica gel tubes and analyzes them by
gas chromatography with a flame ionization detector. A
nitrogen-phosphorous detector was used since acetamide does not
respond as well on a flame ionization detector. The silica gel tubes
were found to have adequate desorption, retention, and storage
stability.
1.1.2 Potential workplace exposure (Ref.
5.1)
Acetamide is used as a solubilizer, plasticizer, stabilizer, to
denature alcohol, and in organic syntheses.
1.1.3 Toxic Effects (This section is for information purposes and
should not be taken as the basis for OSHA policy.) (Ref.
5.2)
Acetamide is classified as a mild irritant with a low toxicity, but
has been classified as a carcinogen by IARC as it tested positive as
an animal carcinogen.
1.1.4 Physical properties (Ref.
5.1):
Physical Properties
|
Compound: |
CH3 CONH2 |
| Molecular weight: |
59.07 |
| Melting point: |
810°C |
| Boiling point: |
222°C |
| Odor: |
mousy odor |
| Color: |
white crystals |
| Molecular formula: |
C2H5NO |
| CAS: |
60-35-5 |
| IMIS: |
A625 |
1.2 Limit defining parameters
1.2.1 The detection limit of the analytical procedure is 10 ng.
This is the smallest amount that could be detected under normal
operating conditions. The injection volume is 1 µL (Figure 1).
1.2.2 The detection limit of the overall procedure is 10 ng/sample
(0.4 ppm based on a 10 liter sample). This is the amount of analyte
placed on a silica gel tube which corresponds to the detection limit
of the analytical procedure.
1.3 Advantages
1.3.1 The sampling procedure is convenient.
1.3.2 The analytical method is reproducible and sensitive.
1.3.3 Reanalysis of samples is possible.
1.3.4 It may be possible to analyze other compounds at the same
time.
1.3.5 Interferences may be avoided by proper selection of column
and GC parameters.
1.4 Disadvantages
none known
2. Sampling procedure
2.1 Apparatus
2.1.1 A calibrated personal sampling pump, the flow of which can be
determined within ± 5% at the recommended flow.
2.1.2 Silica gel tubes (20/40 mesh) containing a 150 mg adsorbing
section with a 75 mg backup section separated by a 2 mm portion of
urethane' foam, with a silanized glass wool plug before the adsorbing
section and a 3 mm plug of urethane foam at the back of the backup
section. The ends are flame sealed and the glass tube containing the
adsorbent is 7 cm long, with a 6 mm O.D. and 4 mm I.D., SKC tubes or
equivalent.
2.2 Sampling technique
2.2.1 The ends of the silica gel tube are opened immediately before
sampling.
2.2.2 Connect the silica gel tube to the sampling pump with
flexible tubing.
2.2.3 Tubes should be placed in a vertical position to minimize
channeling, with the smaller section towards the pump.
2.2.4 Air being sampled should not pass through any hose or tubing
before entering the silica gel tube.
2.2.5 Seal the silica gel tube with plastic caps immediately after
sampling. Seal each sample lengthwise with OSHA Form-21.
2.2.6 With each batch of samples, submit at least one blank tube
from the same lot used for samples. This tube should be subjected to
exactly the same handling as the samples (break ends, seal, &
transport) except that no air is drawn through it.
2.2.7 Transport the samples (and corresponding paperwork) to the
lab for analysis.
2.2.8 Bulks submitted for analysis must be shipped in a separate
container from the air samples.
2.3 Desorption efficiency
2.3.1 A loading of 241.8 µg on the tubes corresponds to 10.6 ppm
based on a 10 liter air volume and the overall desorption efficiency
of 94.4% (Table 1).
2.3.2 A solution of acetamide in methanol was prepared. Aliquots of
this solution were liquid spiked onto eighteen tubes, six at each of
the following loadings; 483.6, 241.8, and 96.72 µg. These levels
correspond to 20, 10 and 4 ppm based on a 10 liter air volume. The
tubes were allowed to equilibrate in the refrigerator overnight. They
were opened, each section placed into a separate 2 mL vial, desorbed
with 1 mL methanol, and allowed to desorb for 30 minutes with
occasional shaking. They were analyzed by GC-NPD. The overall average
desorption was 94.4% (Table 1).
Table 1
Desorption Efficiency
|
| Tube# |
% Desorption |
% Desorption |
% Desorption |
|
483.6 µg |
241.8 µg |
96.72 µg |
|
| 1 |
90.3 |
92.5 |
95.7 |
| 2 |
91.6 |
94.8 |
92.4 |
| 3 |
92.7 |
97.1 |
94.1 |
| 4 |
95.3 |
96.5 |
94.1 |
| 5 |
95.3 |
95.3 |
94.1 |
| 6 |
96.1 |
96.0 |
94.1 |
| |
|
|
|
| average |
93.6 |
95.4 |
94.1 |
| |
|
|
|
| overall average |
94.4% |
|
|
| standard deviation |
±1.83 |
|
|
|
2.4 Retention efficiency
A solution of acetamide in methanol was prepared, and aliquots were
liquid spiked onto seven silica gel tubes, for a loading of 483.6 µg
acetamide. These tubes had 10 liters of humid air (83% RH) drawn
through them. They were desorbed and analyzed by GC-NPD. There was no
acetamide detected in the backup portions of the tubes. The average
amount recovered was 83.5% (Table 2).
Table 2
Retention Efficiency
|
| Tube # |
% Recovered 'A' |
% Recovered 'B' |
% Total |
|
| 1 |
82.5 |
0.0 |
82.5 |
| 2 |
84.3 |
0.0 |
84.3 |
| 3 |
85.2 |
0.0 |
85.2 |
| 4 |
83.4 |
0.0 |
83.2 |
| 5 |
83.9 |
0.0 |
83.9 |
| 6 |
83.0 |
0.0 |
83.0 |
| 7 |
82.1 |
0.0 |
82.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
83.5 |
|
Average
(desorption corrected) |
88.4 |
|
2.5 Storage
A solution of acetamide in methanol was prepared, and aliquots were
spiked onto three tubes for a loading of 483.6 µg acetamide. These
were stored at room temperature (24°C) for seven days. The amount
recovered averaged 94.1% (Table 3).
Table 3
Storage Stability
|
| Tube # |
% Recovered |
|
| 1 |
91.8 |
| 2 |
94.7 |
| 3 |
96.2 |
|
|
|
Average |
94.1 |
|
Average (desorption corrected) |
99.8 |
|
2.6 Air volume and sampling rate studied
2.6.1 The air volume studied was 10 liters.
2.6.2 The sampling rate studied was 0.1 liter per minute.
2.7 Interferences
Suspected interferences should be listed on sample data sheets.
2.8 Safety precautions
2.8.1 Sampling equipment should be placed on an employee in a
manner that does not interfere with work performance or safety.
2.8.2 Safety glasses should be worn at all times.
2.8.3 Follow all safety practices that apply to the workplace being
sampled.
3. Analytical method
3.1 Apparatus
3.1.1 Gas chromatograph equipped with a nitrogen-phosphorus
detector in the nitrogen mode.
3.1.2 GC column capable of separating the analyte from any
interferences. A 6 ft 10% UCON 50-HB-5100 on 80/100 Chrom WAW with 2%
KOH was used for this stop-gap method.
3.1.3 An electronic integrator or some other suitable method of
measuring peak areas.
3.1.4 Two milliliter vials with Teflon-lined caps for sample
desorption.
3.1.5 A 10 µL syringe or other convenient size for sample
injection.
3.1.6 Pipets for dispensing the methanol.
3.1.7 Volumetric flasks - 10 mL and other convenient sizes for
preparing standards.
3.1.8 A balance capable of weighing milligram quantities.
3.2 Reagents
3.2.1 Purified GC grade nitrogen, hydrogen, and air.
3.2.2 Reagent grade methanol.
3.2.3 Reagent grade acetamide.
3.3. Sample preparation
3.3.1 Sample tubes are opened and the front and back
section of each tube are placed in separate 2 mL vials.
3.3.2 Each section is desorbed with 1 mL methanol.
3.3.3 The vials are sealed immediately and allowed to desorb for 30
minutes with occasional shaking.
3.4 Standard preparation
3.4.1 Standards are prepared by diluting a known quantity of
acetamide with methanol.
3.4.2 At least two separate stock standards should be made.
Dilutions of these stocks are made at five different levels covering
the range of the samples. The standards used ranged from 9.67 to 483.6
µg/mL.
3.5 Analysis
3.5.1 Gas chromatograph conditions.
Gas chromatograph conditions
| Flow rates (mL/min) |
Temperature (°C) |
| |
|
| Nitrogen (carrier): 24 |
Injector: 200 |
| Hydrogen (detector): 3 |
Detector: 220 |
| Air (detector): 50 |
Column: 150 |
| |
|
| Injection size: 1 µL |
|
| Elution time: 2.23 min |
|
| Chromatogram: (See Figure 2) |
|
| Attenuation: 6 |
|
3.5.2 Peak areas are measured by an integrator or other suitable
means.
3.6 Interferences (analytical)
3.6.1 Any compound having the general reten.tion time of the
analyte used is an interference. Possible interferences should be
listed on the sample data sheet. GC parameters should be adjusted if
necessary so these interferences will.pose no problems.
3.6.2 Retention time data on a single column is.not considered
proof of chemical identity. Samples over the target concentration
should be confirmed by GC/Mass Spec or other suitable means.
3.7 Calculations
3.7.1 To calculate the concentration of analyte in the air sample
the following formulas are used:
|
(µg/mL) (desorption volume)
|
= |
mass of analyte in sample |
|
(desorption efficiency) |
|
|
|
|
|
(mass of analyte in sample)
|
= |
number of moles of analyte |
|
molecular weight |
|
|
|
|
(number of moles) (molar volume) of analyte
at 25°C and 760 mmHg |
= |
volume the analyte will occupy at 25°C
& 760 mmHg |
|
|
|
|
|
(volume analyte occupies) (106) *
|
= |
ppm |
|
(air volume) |
|
|
| |
|
|
| * All units must cancel. |
|
|
3.7.2 The above formulas can be combined to the formula given
below. To calculate the ppm of analyte in the sample based on a 10
liter air sample, and a 1 mL desorbing solution:
| (µg/mL)(1
mL)(24.45)(106) × (g) |
× (mg) |
|
|
|
= |
ppm |
|
(10 L) (DE) (MW) |
(1000 mg) |
(1000 µg) |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| µg/mL |
= |
concentration of analyte in sample or
standard |
| 24.45 |
= |
Molar volume (liters/mole) at 25°C and
760 mmHg. |
| MW |
= |
Molecular weight (g/mole) |
| 1 mL |
= |
Desorption volume |
| 10 L |
= |
10 liter air sample |
| DE |
= |
Desorption
efficiency |
3.7.3 This calculation is done for each section of the sampling
tube and the results added together.
3.8 Safety precautions
3.8.1 All handling of solvents should be done in a hood.
3.8.2 Avoid skin contact with all solvents. 3.8.3. Wear safety
glasses at all times.
4. Recommendations for further study
5. References
5.1 Windholz, M., "The Merck Index".
Tenth Edition, Merck & Co., Rahway N.J., 1983, p. 6.
5.2 Sax, N. "Dangerous Properties of
Industrial Materials", Fifth Edition, Van Nostrand Reinhold Co., New
York, 1979, p. 322.