ACRYLIC ACID | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Method number: | PV2005 | |
| Matrix: | Air | |
| Target concentration: | acrylic acid: | 2 ppm (5.9 mg/m3) (ACGIH TLV) (skin) |
| methacrylic acid: | 20 ppm (70 mg/m3) (ACGIH TLV) | |
| Procedure: | Samples are collected by drawing a known volume of air through two Anasorb 708 tubes connected in series. Samples are desorbed with 2 mL of methanol for 1 hour with shaking and analyzed by liquid chromatography using an ultraviolet detector at 210 nm (LC-UV). | |
| Recommended air volume and sampling rate: |
24 L at 0.1 L/min | |
| Reliable quantitation limit: | acrylic acid: | 0.00301 ppm (0.00888 mg/m3) |
| methacrylic acid: | 0.00475 ppm (0.0170 mg/m3) | |
| Status of method: | Partially Evaluated Method. This method has been subjected to established evaluation procedures, and is presented for information and trial use. | |
| Date: July, 1996 | Chemist: Mary E. Eide | |
Organic Service Branch I
OSHA Salt Lake Technical
Center
Salt Lake City, UT 84165-0200
1. General Discussion
There is an OSHA validated method (28) for acrylic acid (Ref.
5.1) and a
1.1.2 Toxic effects (This section is for information only and should not be taken as the basis of OSHA policy.) (Ref. 5.3 and Ref. 5.4)
Acrylic acid is an acute irritant to skin, eyes, and mucous membranes. Acrylic acid is readily adsorbed through the skin. Rats exposed to 300 ppm acrylic acid for 5 days/week for 4 weeks showed nose irritation, lethargy, and reduced weight gain. Mice exposed to 75 ppm acrylic acid 6 hours/day 5 days/week for 13 weeks showed slight degenerative lesions on the nasal mucous membranes. Methacrylic acid is a severe contact irritant, and direct contact can cause blindness and skin ulceration. Rats exposed to 300 ppm methacrylic acid for 20 days showed slight renal congestion. The TLVs of 2 ppm for acrylic acid and 20 ppm for methacrylic acid were established at these levels to prevent injury due to exposure to these compounds.
1.1.3 Workplace exposure (Ref. 5.3 and 5.4)
Acrylic acid and methacrylic acid are used as a monomers for the manufacture of resins and polymers, and in organic syntheses. The U.S. production of acrylic acid and its esters is about 500,000 tons per year.
1.1.4 Physical properties and other descriptive information (Ref. 5.5 and 5.6)
| Acrylic acid | |
| Synonyms: CAS number: IMIS: RTECS: DOT: Molecular weight: Flash point: Boiling point: Melting point: Odor: Odor threshold: Color: Autoignition temperature: Density: Molecular formula: Structural formula: |
Acroleic acid; Ethylene carboxylic acid; Propene acid;
Propenoic acid; Vinyl formic
acid 79-10-7 0117 AS4375000 UN 2218 corrosive liquid 72.06 68°C (155°F)(oc) 141°C 14°C acrid 1 ppm colorless liquid 238°C (820°F) 1.05204 (g/mL) C3H4O2 |
| Methacrylic acid | |
| Synonyms: CAS number IMIS: RTECS: DOT: Molecular weight: Flash point: Boiling point: Melting point: Odor: Color: Autoignition temperature: Density: Molecular formula: Structural formula: |
alpha-Methacrylic acid;
79-41-4 M339 OZ2975000 UN2531 corrosive liquid 86.09 76°C (170°F)(coc) 163°C 15°C acrid, like acetic acid colorless to pale yellow liquid 435°C (815°F) 1.0153254 (g/mL) C4H6O2 ![]() |
The detection limit of the overall procedure for acrylic acid is 0.064 µg per sample (0.001 ppm or 0.00267 mg/m3; and for methacrylic acid is 0.123 µg per sample (0.0015 ppm or 0.00513 mg/m3). This is the amount of analyte spiked on the sampler that will give a response that is significantly different from the background response of a sampler blank.
The DLOP is defined as the concentration of analyte that gives a response (YDLOP) that is significantly different (three standard deviations (SDBR)) from the background response (YBR).
The direct measurement of YBR and SDBR in chromatographic methods is typically inconvenient, and difficult because YBR is usually extremely low. Estimates of these parameters can be made with data obtained from the analysis of a series of samples whose responses are in the vicinity of the background response. The regression curve obtained for a plot of instrument response versus concentration of analyte will usually be linear. Assuming SDBR and the precision of data about the curve are similar, the standard error of estimate (SEE) for the regression curve can be substituted for SDBR in the above in the above equation. The following calculations derive a formula for the DLOP:

| Yobs | = | observed response |
| Yest | = | estimated response from regression curve |
| n | = | total no. of data points |
| k | = | 2 for a linear regression curve |
At point YDLOP on the regression curve
| YDLOP = A(DLOP) + YBR | A = analytical sensitivity (slope) |
| DLOP = | (YDLOP -
YBR)
A |
Substituting 3(SEE) + YBR for YDLOP gives
| DLOP = | 3(SEE)
A |
The DLOP is measured as mass per sample and expressed as equivalent air concentrations, based on the recommended sampling parameters. Ten samplers were spiked with equal descending increments of analyte, such that the lowest sampler loading was 0.2 µg/sample. This is the amount, when spiked on a sampler, that would produce a peak approximately 10 times the background response for the sample blank. These spiked samplers, and the sample blank, were analyzed with the recommended analytical parameters, and the data obtained used to calculate the required parameters (A and SEE) for the calculation of the DLOP. Values of 5157 and 109.9 were obtained for A and SEE respectively for acrylic acid. The DLOP for acrylic acid was calculated to be 0.064 µg/sample (0.001 ppm). Values of 2838 and 116 were obtained for A and SEE respectively for methacrylic acid. The DLOP for methacrylic acid was calculated to be 0.123 µg/sample (0.0015 ppm).
| Table 1.2.1.1 Detection Limit of the Overall Procedure for acrylic acid | |
| mass per sample | area counts |
| (µg) | (µV-s) |
|
| |
| 0.2 | 2048 |
| 0.4 | 2732 |
| 0.6 | 3824 |
| 0.8 | 4865 |
| 1.0 | 6039 |
| 1.2 | 6890 |
| 1.4 | 8103 |
| 1.6 | 9069 |
| 1.8 | 10113 |
| 2.0 | 11127 |
|
| |

| Table 1.2.1.2 Detection Limit of the Overall Procedure for methacrylic acid | |
| mass per sample | area counts |
| (µg) | (µV-s) |
|
| |
| 0.2 | 1138 |
| 0.4 | 1427 |
| 0.6 | 1985 |
| 0.8 | 2724 |
| 1.0 | 3278 |
| 1.2 | 3730 |
| 1.4 | 4569 |
| 1.6 | 4910 |
| 1.8 | 5455 |
| 2.0 | 6122 |
|
| |

1.2.2 Reliable quantitation limit (RQL)
The reliable quantitation limit is 0.213 µg per sample for acrylic acid (0.00301 ppm), and 0.409 µg per sample for methacrylic acid (0.00475 ppm). This is the amount of analyte spiked on a sampler that will give a signal that is considered the lower limit for precise quantitative measurements.
The RQL is considered the lower limit for precise quantitative measurements. It is determined from the regression line data obtained for the calculation of the DLOP (Section 1.2.1 ), providing at least 75% of the analyte is recovered. The RQL is defined as the concentration of analyte that gives a response (YRQL) such that
therefore
| RQL = | 10(SEE)
A |
The RQL is the lowest loading at which 75% of the analyte, or more, can be recovered as determined from the regression line of the plotted data.
| Table 1.2.2.1 Reliable Quantitation Limit | ||
| mass per sample (µg) |
mass recovered (µg) |
recovery (%) |
|
| ||
| 0.2 | 0.197 | 98.5 |
| 0.4 | 0.388 | 97.0 |
| 0.6 | 0.592 | 98.7 |
| 0.8 | 0.780 | 97.5 |
| 1.0 | 0.941 | 94.1 |
| 1.2 | 1.189 | 99.1 |
| 1.4 | 1.387 | 99.1 |
| 1.6 | 1.582 | 98.9 |
| 1.8 | 1.753 | 97.4 |
| 2.0 | 1.934 | 96.7 |
|
| ||

| Table 1.2.2.2 Reliable Quantitation Limit | ||
| mass per sample (µg) |
mass recovered (µg) |
recovery (%) |
|
| ||
| 0.2 | 0.196 | 98.0 |
| 0.4 | 0.396 | 99.0 |
| 0.6 | 0.592 | 98.7 |
| 0.8 | 0.772 | 96.5 |
| 1.0 | 0.998 | 99.8 |
| 1.2 | 1.188 | 99.0 |
| 1.4 | 1.340 | 95.7 |
| 1.6 | 1.534 | 95.9 |
| 1.8 | 1.787 | 99.3 |
| 2.0 | 1.974 | 98.7 |
|
| ||



2. Sampling Procedure
2.1.2 Samples are collected with 7 cm × 4 mm i.d. × 6 mm o.d.
glass sampling tubes packed with one section of 100 mg of Anasorb
708 in series. The section is held in place with glass wool plugs,
in each tube. For this evaluation, commercially prepared sampling
tubes were purchased from SKC, Inc. (Fullerton, CA, catalog no.
2.2 Technique
2.2.2 Attach the sampling train to the pump with flexible tubing. It is desirable to utilize sampling tube holders which have a protective cover to shield the employee from the sharp, jagged end of the sampling tube.
2.2.3 Air being sampled should not pass through any hose or tubing before entering the sampling train.
2.2.4 Attach the sampling train vertically with the outer tube pointing downward, in the worker's breathing zone, and positioned so it does not impede work performance or safety.
2.2.5 After sampling for the appropriate time, remove the sample
train and seal each tube with intact plastic end caps. Wrap each
tube separately
2.2.6 Submit at least one blank sample with each set of samples. Handle the blank sampler in the same manner as the other samples except draw no air through it.
2.2.7 Record sample volumes (in liters of air) for each sample, along with any potential interferences.
2.2.8 Ship any bulk samples separate from the air samples.
2.2.9 Submit the samples to the laboratory for analysis as soon as possible after sampling. If delay is unavoidable, store the samples in a refrigerator.
2.3 Desorption efficiency
| Table 2.3.1 Desorption Efficiency of Acrylic acid | ||||
| Tube # | % Recovered | |||
| 0.1 × | 0.5 × | 1.0 × | 2.0 × | |
| 8 µg | 40 µg | 80 µg | 160 µg | |
|
| ||||
| 1 | 98.0 | 98.6 | 98.1 | 99.7 |
| 2 | 98.4 | 98.5 | 98.2 | 99.5 |
| 3 | 99.9 | 98.6 | 98.5 | 99.0 |
| 4 | 98.8 | 99.2 | 98.2 | 99.2 |
| 5 | 97.0 | 98.6 | 99.0 | 98.8 |
| 6 | 98.5 | 98.0 | 99.2 | 99.0 |
| average | 98.4 | 98.6 | 98.5 | 99.2 |
| overall average |
98.7 | |||
| standard deviation |
±0.629 | |||
|
| ||||
2.3.2 The desorption efficiencies of methacrylic acid were
determined by
| Table 2.3.2 Desorption Efficiency of Methacrylic acid | ||||
| Tube # | % Recovered | |||
| 0.1 × | 0.5 × | 1.0 × | 2.0 × | |
| 71 µg | 355 µg | 711 µg | 1420 µg | |
|
| ||||
| 1 | 96.9 | 98.9 | 98.3 | 98.7 |
| 2 | 99.1 | 99.6 | 98.8 | 98.7 |
| 3 | 98.0 | 98.8 | 98.7 | 98.3 |
| 4 | 97.8 | 98.0 | 98.8 | 99.2 |
| 5 | 98.0 | 97.2 | 98.6 | 101 |
| 6 | 99.2 | 98.1 | 98.9 | 98.5 |
| average | 98.2 | 98.4 | 98.7 | 99.1 |
| overall average |
98.6 | |||
| standard deviation |
±0.810 | |||
|
| ||||
2.4 Retention efficiency
The sampling tubes were spiked at the 2 × PEL level, loadings of
160 µg acrylic acid and 1420 µg methacrylic acid,
allowed to equilibrate 4 hours, and then had 24 L humid air (81% RH at
21°C) pulled through them at 0.1 Lpm. They were opened, desorbed, and
analyzed by
| Table 2.4.1 Retention Efficiency of Acrylic acid | |||
| Tube # | % Recovered | ||
| Front section | Back section | Total | |
|
| |||
| 1 | 99.9 | 0.0 | 99.9 |
| 2 | 98.6 | 0.1 | 98.7 |
| 3 | 100 | 0.0 | 100 |
| 4 | 97.1 | 0.3 | 97.4 |
| 5 | 98.6 | 0.2 | 98.8 |
| 6 | 98.4 | 0.1 | 98.5 |
| average | 98.9 | ||
|
| |||
| Table 2.4.2 Retention Efficiency of Methacrylic acid | |||
| Tube # | % Recovered | ||
| Front section | Back section | Total | |
|
| |||
| 1 | 100 | 0.0 | 100 |
| 2 | 95.6 | 2.0 | 97.6 |
| 3 | 101 | 0.0 | 101 |
| 4 | 98.7 | 0.0 | 98.7 |
| 5 | 101 | 0.0 | 101 |
| 6 | 99.9 | 0.0 | 99.9 |
| average | 99.7 | ||
|
| |||
2.5 Sample storage
The front sections of twelve sampling tubes were each spiked with 80 µg acrylic acid and 711 µg methacrylic acid. Twelve more tubes were spiked at the same loadings and then had 24 liters of humid air (81% RH at 22°C) drawn through them at 0.1 Lpm. Six samples from each group were stored at room temperature (24°C) and the other six tubes stored at refrigerator temperature (-4°C). Three samples of each type were analyzed after 7 days and the remaining three samples of each type after 14 days. The amounts recovered, corrected for desorption efficiency, indicate good storage stability for the time period studied and had an average recovery of 99.3% for all acrylic acid conditions, and 99.4% for all methacrylic acid conditions.
| Table 2.5.1 Storage Test for Acrylic acid | ||||
| Time | % Recovery | % Recovery | % Recovery | % Recovery |
| (days) | Dry | Dry | Humid | Humid |
| Refrigerated | Ambient | Refrigerated | Ambient | |
|
| ||||
| 7 | 100 | 100 | 99.9 | 99.8 |
| 7 | 99.6 | 99.9 | 100 | 99.1 |
| 7 | 99.2 | 99.3 | 98.0 | 99.0 |
| 14 | 98.8 | 100 | 98.1 | 99.6 |
| 14 | 99.9 | 99.2 | 99.8 | 98.2 |
| 14 | 99.2 | 99.5 | 99.0 | 97.0 |
| average | 99.5 | 99.7 | 99.1 | 98.8 |
|
| ||||
| Table 2.5.2 Storage Test for Methacrylic acid | ||||
| Time | % Recovery | % Recovery | % Recovery | % Recovery |
| (days) | Dry | Dry | Humid | Humid |
| Refrigerated | Ambient | Refrigerated | Ambient | |
|
| ||||
| 7 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 99.7 |
| 7 | 99.2 | 99.6 | 100 | 100 |
| 7 | 99.3 | 99.3 | 100 | 98.8 |
| 14 | 98.8 | 99.5 | 102 | 98.2 |
| 14 | 100 | 101 | 98.9 | 97.6 |
| 14 | 99.5 | 98.2 | 97.0 | 98.6 |
| average | 99.5 | 99.6 | 99.7 | 98.8 |
|
| ||||
2.6 Recommended air volume and sampling rate.
Based on the data collected in this evaluation, 24 L air samples should be collected at a sampling rate of 0.1 L/min.
2.7 Interferences (sampling)
2.7.2 Suspected interferences should be reported to the laboratory with submitted samples.
2.8 Safety precautions (sampling)
2.8.2 Follow all safety practices that apply to the work area being sampled.
2.8.3 Wear eye protection should be worn when breaking the ends of the glass sampling tubes.
3. Analytical Procedure
3.1.2 An LC column capable of separating the analyte from any
interferences. The column used in this study was a
3.1.3 An electronic integrator or some suitable method of measuring peak areas.
3.1.4 Four milliliter vials with TeflonTM-lined caps.
3.1.5 A 100 µL syringe or other convenient size for sample injection.
3.1.6 Pipets for dispensing the desorbing solution.
3.1.7 Volumetric flasks - 10 mL and other convenient sizes for preparing standards.
3.2 Reagents
3.2.2 Methacrylic acid, Reagent grade
3.2.3 Methanol, HPLC grade
3.2.4 Deionized water, the water used in this study was from a
Millipore
3.2.5 Phosphoric acid, Reagent grade
3.2.6 Acetonitrile, HPLC grade
3.2.7 The mobile phase was 0.1:4:96 solution of phosphoric acid: acetonitrile: water.
3.3 Standard preparation
3.3.2 Dilutions of these stock standards were prepared to bracket the samples. The range of the standards used in this study was from 1.05 to 1050 µg/mL acrylic acid and 1.015 to 1015 µg/mL methacrylic acid.
3.4 Sample preparation
3.4.2 Each section is desorbed with 2 mL of methanol.
3.4.3 The vials are sealed immediately and allowed to desorb for 1 hour with constant shaking.
3.5 Analysis
| Injection size: | 10 µL |
| Column: | LC-8-DB, 5µ, 25cm, 4.6 mm I.D. |
| Mobile phase: | 96% water 4% acetonitrile 0.1% phosphoric acid |
| Detector: | Waters 490 E programmable multiwavelength detector at 210 nm. |

3.5.2 Peak areas are measured by an integrator or other suitable means.
3.6 Interferences (analytical)
3.6.2 When necessary, the identity or purity of an analyte peak
may be confirmed by




3.7 Calculations
3.7.2 The values for the air samples and blanks are obtained from the calibration curve.
3.7.3 Values (µg) obtained for blanks are subtracted from air samples.
3.7.4 To calculate the concentration of analyte in the air sample the following formulas are used:
| (µg/m) (desorption volume)
(desorption efficiency) |
= mass of analyte in sample |
| (mass of analyte in sample)
molecular weight |
= number of moles of analyte |
| (number of moles of analyte) |
(molar volume at 25°C & 760mm) |
= | volume the analyte
will occupy at 25°C & 760mm |
| (volume analyte occupies)
(106)*
(air volume) |
= ppm |
* All units must cancel.
3.7.5 The above equations can be consolidated to the following formula.
| (µg/mL)(DV)(24.46)(106)(g)(mg)
(24 L)(DE)(MW)(1000mg)(1000µg) |
= ppm |
| µg/mL | = concentration of analyte in sample or standard |
| 24.46 | = Molar volume (liters/mole) at 25°C and 760 mm |
| MW | = Molecular weight (g/mole) |
| DV | = Desorption volume |
| 24 L | = 24 liter air sample |
| DE | = Desorption efficiency |
3.8 Safety precautions (analytical)
3.8.2 Wear safety glasses, gloves and a lab coat at all times while in the laboratory areas.
4. Recommendations for Further Study
Collection studies should be performed from a dynamically generated test atmosphere.
5. References
5.2 Eide, M., "Methacrylic Acid", Organic Service Branch I, OSHA
Salt Lake Technical Center, 1988, OSHA SLTC
5.3 Documentation of the Threshold Limit Values and Biological Exposure Indices, Fifth Edition, American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists Inc., Cincinnati, OH, 1986, p.14.1.
5.4 Documentation of the Threshold Limit Values and Biological Exposure Indices, Fifth Edition, American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists Inc., Cincinnati, OH, 1986, p.362.
5.5 Budavari, S., The Merck Index, Twelfth Edition, Merck & Co., Inc., Whitehouse Station NJ, 1996, p. 23.
5.6 Budavari, S., The Merck Index, Twelfth Edition, Merck & Co., Inc., Whitehouse Station NJ, 1996, p. 1015.