Make sure workers know how to shield their faces from specific
hazards.
by Todd Nighswonger
It started as a typical work day for Dan Francis. As a caster at Doe
Run Co.'s Resource Recycling Division in Boss, Mo., Francis was
casting molten lead into 1-ton molds, just like he'd done many times
before. But when he put the pouring spout into the mold and opened a
valve, 900-degree molten lead hit the side of the mold and splashed
toward his face.
The searing liquid hit Francis directly on his face shield. Some of
the lead went under the shield, hitting his safety glasses and
respirator.
What could have been a disaster on Oct. 10, 1996, resulted in only
minor first-degree burns between his eyebrows and on the bridge of
his nose. Francis, whose eyelashes were matted together and could
not see at first, was kept from further harm because he was wearing
personal protective equipment (PPE), including a face shield,
required for the job.
The moral of this real-life story: If a work environment calls for
protecting the face, start with safety glasses or goggles, then add
protection as needed. Because Francis followed that advice, he was
awarded the Prevent Blindness America's 1998 Wise Owl Award, which
recognizes an individual whose sight was saved by wearing protective
eyewear in a serious accident.
"I didn't even have time to think," Francis, now 26 years old, said
upon receiving the award. "I know right now I'd probably be blind
and have permanent scars on my face if Doe Run hadn't required a
face shield on this particular job."
Not all employers, though, have an adequate face protection policy
or ensure that their employees adhere to it. Workers injured in the
face who were surveyed in a Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) study
indicated that face protection was not normally used in their line
of work, or it was not required for the type of work performed at
the time of the accident.
Doing a hazard assessment and establishing a policy are
prerequisites to providing adequate face protection as part of a
worker's PPE, said Tod Turriff, vice president of program and
information services for Prevent Blindness America. The policy
should be one that meets or exceeds federal regulations and one that
employees will accept, he added.
The American National Standard Institute's (ANSI) Z87.1-1989
standard for eye and face protection establishes criteria used by
OSHA in its standard, 29 CFR 1910.133. ANSI Z87.1 states that face
shields must only be worn over eye protection.
Basic eye protection for anyone who walks into, or works in, a
hazardous area includes safety glasses with side shields, said
Turriff, chairman of the ANSI Z87.1 committee. "Most people think
that the only time they are exposed to a hazard is when they're
working on something, and that's not the case," he said. "It's any
time they're exposed to a hazard in a particular work area."
Suitable face protectors must be provided where there is a potential
for injury to the face from flying particles, molten metal, liquid
chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors,
potentially injurious light radiation or a combination of these.
Selection
For starters, every face protector should be distinctly marked to
identify the manufacturer and that it meets ANSI Z87.1
specifications. Then, it's a matter of selecting the proper
protector for the situation.
Face hazards in the workplace come from physical, electromagnetic
spectrum or biological elements, said Dr. Bernard Blais, an
occupational ophthalmologist in Clifton Park, N.Y. Physical hazards
include impact, heat, chemicals and dust. Electromagnetic spectrum
hazards, found in welding-type applications, are visible light,
ultraviolet radiation and infrared radiation. Biological hazards
involve spattering of bodily fluids, typically in the health care
field.
Each face protector is designed for one or more of the three classes
of hazards. When selecting the type and amount of protection,
consider the kind and the degree of the hazard.
Once the proper ANSI-approved shield has been determined for the
work application, selecting from various models and manufacturers
depends on user preference, said Tim Esposito, vice president of
sales and marketing for Jackson Products, a manufacturer of face
shields. While deciding how much protection is enough can be
challenging, Esposito noted that "if the job deals with something
like grinding wheels all day, you want to have as much protection as
possible. Basing a decision on economics is being short-sighted for
that type of application."
Most visors curve around the face, although one-piece models that
conform to a face's shape are available. Aluminum-bound shields,
often made of acetate, can be shaped to the size of the user's face.
A visor, which can be stationary or lift above the head, typically
fastens to a head band, a helmet or a hard hat. Some shields include
built-in safety goggles to provide all-in-one eye and face
protection.
Hazards
ANSI Z87.1 indicates what types of face protection are needed for a
particular hazard. Following is a breakdown of each hazard category:
Impact. The BLS survey noted that the typical injury was caused by
flying or falling blunt metal objects. Lacerations, fractures,
broken teeth and contusions were common types of injuries reported.
Impact hazards are found in a variety of jobs. ANSI Z87.1 calls for
a shield that withstands minimum ballistic impact testing resistance
of a steel ball traveling at 300 feet per second. The shield must be
a nominal .040 inches thick.
One of the most popular materials used today for impact-resistant
face shields is polycarbonate. Although more expensive than other
materials commonly used in shields, such as PETG (polythylene
terephthalate, glycol modified) and sometimes acetate, many users
prefer polycarbonate. It provides high-impact protection and is the
best all-around material, said Jack B. Hirschmann Jr., president of
Oberon Co., a maker of specialty face shields.
Jackson's Esposito also calls polycarbonate the safest material for
impact resistance and said it provides, along with acetate, very
good scratch resistance.
Heat. Polycarbonate offers a fair amount of heat resistance,
especially against ambient heat. "The ambient temperature your body
can withstand is far lower than what a polycarbonate window can
withstand," Hirschmann said.
Still, untreated materials will not hold up in high-temperature
exposures, where total body protection is needed. "If you're in that
type of environment," Esposito said, "you need more than a face
shield to protect the user." In high-temperature cases, Z87.1 calls
for a reflective or screened face shield.
Chemical. In chemical applications, more than any other, eye and
face protection should start with a goggle to seal the eye area from
hazards. Then, a chemical-resistant face shield would be in order
for chemicals that harm skin.
It is important to protect the worker's eyes, ears, mouth and nose
from chemicals, Esposito said. "Some chemicals will eat right
through any of the materials. With other chemicals, degradation of
the visor will be slowed down."
Optical radiation. The important thing to remember with the
electromagnetic spectrum is that it includes visible light,
ultraviolet and infrared hazards. Whether a goggle, face shield or
welding helmet is appropriate depends on the type of exposure when
welding, cutting, torching or brazing.
"You not only have to protect your eyes, you have to protect your
face," said James R. "Rusty" Franklin, vice president of sales and
marketing for Sellstrom Manufacturing Co., a manufacturer of welding
protectors. "It's a function of spatter and the amount of
ultraviolet. You can get a sunburn in an exposed area if you don't
have that protection."
Equipment fitted with appropriate filter lenses is needed to protect
against light radiation. Tinted and shaded lenses are not filter
lenses unless marked or identified as such.
Filter lenses have a shade number appropriate for the work being
performed. Base the shade selection, once the proper range is
determined, on eye sensitivity and arc density, Franklin said.
By choosing the appropriate eye and face protection, employers can
eliminate blindness and disfigurement that results from these
preventable workplace incidents.
This article was brought to you with permission from Occupational
Hazards, Penton Media Inc. (http://www.occupationalhazards.com).
All rights reserved. Duplication in any form without permission,
including
photocopying or electronic reproduction or dissemination, is
prohibited