|
|---|
The owner or operator of any affected unit equipped with post-combustion SO Base the empirical and process simulation methods or models on the fundamental chemistry and engineering principles involved in the treatment of pollutant gas. On a case-by-case basis, the Administrator may pre-certify commercially available process simulation methods and models.
Continuously monitor, determine, and record hourly averages of the estimated SO 1.2.1 Parameters for Wet Flue Gas Desulfurization System
1.2.1.1 Number of scrubber modules in operation.
1.2.1.2 Total slurry rate to each scrubber module (gal per min).
1.2.1.3 In-line absorber pH of each scrubber module.
1.2.1.4 Pressure differential across each scrubber module (inches of water column).
1.2.1.5 Unit load (MWe).
1.2.1.6 Inlet and outlet SO 1.2.1.7 Percent solids in slurry for each scrubber module.
1.2.1.8 Any other parameters necessary to verify scrubber removal efficiency, if the Administrator determines the parameters above are not sufficient.
1.2.2 Parameters for Dry Flue Gas Desulfurization System
1.2.2.1 Number of scrubber modules in operation.
1.2.2.2 Atomizer slurry flow rate to each scrubber module (gal per min).
1.2.2.3 Inlet and outlet temperature for each scrubber module ( °F).
1.2.2.4 Pressure differential across each scrubber module (inches of water column).
1.2.2.5 Unit load (MWe).
1.2.2.6 Inlet and outlet SO 1.2.2.7 Any other parameters necessary to verify scrubber removal efficiency, if the Administrator determines the parameters above are not sufficient.
If SO 1.2.4.1 Inlet air flow rate to the unit (boiler) (mcf/hr).
1.2.4.2 Excess oxygen concentration of flue gas at stack outlet (percent).
1.2.4.3 Carbon monoxide concentration of flue gas at stack outlet (ppm).
1.2.4.4 Temperature of flue gas at outlet of the unit ( °F).
1.2.4.5 Inlet and outlet NO 1.2.4.6 Any other parameters specific to the emission reduction process necessary to verify the NO Establish a method for correlating hourly averages of the parameters identified above with the percent removal efficiency of the SO Each parametric data substitution procedure should develop a data correlation procedure to verify the performance of the SO For NO 1.4.1 Use the following equation to calculate substitute data for filling in missing (outlet) SO M M I E = Removal efficiency of SO 1.4.2 Use the following equation to calculate substitute data for filling in missing (outlet) NO M M I E = Removal efficiency of post-combustion NO 1.5.1 If both the inlet and the outlet SO 1.5.2 If both the inlet and outlet NO Apply to the Administrator for approval and certification of the parametric substitution procedure for filling in missing SO This procedure is applicable for data from all affected units for use in accordance with the provisions of this part to provide substitute data for volumetric flow rate (scfh), NO 2.2.1 For a single unit, establish ten operating load ranges defined in terms of percent of the maximum hourly average gross load of the unit, in gross megawatts (MWge), as shown in Table C-1. (Do not use integrated hourly gross load in MW-hr.) For units sharing a common stack monitored with a single flow monitor, the load ranges for flow (but not for NO 2.2.2 Beginning with the first hour of unit operation after installation and certification of the flow monitor or the NO 2.2.3 Beginning with the first hour of unit operation after installation and certification of the flow monitor or the NO 2.2.3.1 Average of the hourly flow rates reported by a flow monitor, in scfh.
2.2.3.2 The 90th percentile value of hourly flow rates, in scfh.
2.2.3.3 The 95th percentile value of hourly flow rates, in scfh.
2.2.3.4 The maximum value of hourly flow rates, in scfh.
2.2.3.5 Average of the hourly NO 2.2.3.6 The 90th percentile value of hourly NO 2.2.3.7 The 95th percentile value of hourly NO 2.2.3.8 The maximum value of hourly NO 2.2.3.9 Average of the hourly NO 2.2.3.10 The 90th percentile value of hourly NO 2.2.3.11 The 95th percentile value of hourly NO 2.2.3.12 The maximum value of hourly NO 2.2.4 Calculate all monitor or continuous emission monitoring system data averages, maximum values, and percentile values determined by this procedure using bias adjusted values in the load ranges.
2.2.5 When a bias adjustment is necessary for the flow monitor and/or the NO 2.2.6 Use the calculated monitor or monitoring system data averages, maximum values, and percentile values to substitute for missing flow rate and NO [58 FR 3701, Jan. 11, 1993, as amended at 60 FR 26547, 26548, May 17, 1995; 63 FR 57313, Oct. 27, 1998; 64 FR 28652, May 26, 1999]1.2 Petition Requirements
1.2.3 Parameters for Other Flue Gas Desulfurization Systems
1.2.4 Parameters for Post-Combustion NO
1.3 Correlation of Emissions With Parameters
1.4 Calculations
1.5 Missing Data
1.6 Application
2. Load-Based Procedure for Missing Flow Rate and NO
2.1 Applicability
2.2 Procedure
Table C-1--Definition of Operating Load Ranges for Load-based
Substitution Data Procedures
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Percent of
maximum
hourly gross
load or
Operating load range maximum
hourly gross
steam load
(percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1......................................................... 0-10
2......................................................... <ls-thn-eq>1
0-20
3......................................................... <ls-thn-eq>2
0-30
4......................................................... <ls-thn-eq>3
0-40
5......................................................... <ls-thn-eq>4
0-50
6......................................................... <ls-thn-eq>5
0-60
7......................................................... <ls-thn-eq>6
0-70
8......................................................... <ls-thn-eq>7
0-80
9......................................................... <ls-thn-eq>8
0-90
10........................................................ <ls-thn-eq>9
0
------------------------------------------------------------------------